In Robert L. Perkins (ed.), International Kierkegaard Commentary: Point of View. Mercer University Press (2010)
Following the pattern set by the early German Romantics, Kierkegaard conveys many of his insights through literature rather than academic prose. What makes him a valuable member of this tradition is the theory he develops to support it, his so-called “theory of indirect communication.” The most exciting aspect of this theory concerns the alleged importance of indirect communication: Kierkegaard claims that there are some projects only it can accomplish. This paper provides a critical account of two arguments Kierkegaard offers in defense of this claim. The first argument is that he needs to use indirect communication in order to discourage people from losing themselves in the “crowd”. The second argument is that he needs to use it in order to help people out of a “monstrous illusion”. It is shown that while both arguments justify Kierkegaard’s decision to use indirect communication, neither one supports the original claim about its indispensability.
|Keywords||Kierkegaard Indirect Communication Christendom Self-Deception Authenticity|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Betrayal in Teaching: Persuasion in Kierkegaard, Theory and Performance. [REVIEW]David A. Borman - 2006 - Continental Philosophy Review 39 (3):245-272.
To Be as No-One: Kierkegaard and Climacus on the Art of Indirect Communication.Vanessa Rumble - 1995 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 3 (2):307 – 321.
The Pragmatics of 'Never Tell Too Plainly': Indirect Communication in Chan Buddhism.Youru Wang - 2000 - Asian Philosophy 10 (1):7 – 31.
Kierkegaard on Indirect Communication.Harry S. Broudy - 1961 - Journal of Philosophy 58 (9):225-233.
Kierkegaard, Indirect Communication, and Ambiguity.Jamie Turnbull - 2009 - Heythrop Journal 50 (1):13-22.
Stealing a Gift: Kierkegaard's Pseudonyms and the Bible.Jolita Pons - 2004 - Fordham University Press.
Kierkegaard, Indirect Communication, and Religious Truth.J. Kellenberger - 1984 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 16 (2):153 - 160.
Who is the Single Individual?: On the Religious and the Secular in Kierkegaard.Brayton Polka - 2005 - Philosophy and Theology 17 (1/2):157-175.
Kierkegaard on the Need for Indirect Communication.Antony Aumann - 2008 - Dissertation, Indiana University
Added to index2009-12-07
Total downloads293 ( #10,427 of 2,164,237 )
Recent downloads (6 months)21 ( #16,472 of 2,164,237 )
How can I increase my downloads?