Epistemic justification

Philosophical Studies 40 (3):419 - 429 (1981)
Abstract
The article begins by developing a distinction between two sorts of epistemic justification--Namely, A proposition's being justified and a person's being justified in accepting a proposition. It concludes that the latter sort of justification is what is crucial for knowing. The article also makes various observations about the alleged foundation of knowledge and about chisholm's rules of evidence
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00646427
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 28,756
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Epistemic Responsibility.J. Angelo Corlett - 2008 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 16 (2):179 – 200.
Justification À la Mode and Justification Simpliciter.Jane Duran - 1994 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 24 (2):178-191.
What Else Justification Could Be.Martin Smith - 2010 - Noûs 44 (1):10 - 31.
Causal Reference and Epistemic Justification.Jane Duran - 1988 - Philosophy of Science 55 (2):272-279.
Epistemic Justification.William Alston - 1989 - Cornell University Press.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

39 ( #133,934 of 2,177,829 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #317,245 of 2,177,829 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums