Dignity

Philosophy 51 (197):251 - 271 (1976)
Abstract
Why, however, should it be necessarily wrong to discuss the nebulous in a businesslike manner?
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S003181910001932X
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,719
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Cognitive Enhancement: Methods, Ethics, Regulatory Challenges. [REVIEW]Nick Bostrom - 2009 - Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (3):311-341.
Dignity's Gauntlet.Remy Debes - 2009 - Philosophical Perspectives 23 (1):45-78.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
The Varieties of Dignity.Lennart Nordenfelt - 2004 - Health Care Analysis 12 (2):69-81.
Human Dignity as a Right.Shaoping Gan - 2009 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 4 (3):370-384.
Dignity Promotion and Beneficence.Diego S. Silva - 2010 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 7 (4):365-372.
Death with Dignity.P. Allmark - 2002 - Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (4):255-257.
Kant's Conception of Human Dignity.Oliver Sensen - 2009 - Kant-Studien 100 (3):309-331.
Undignified Bioethics.Alasdair Cochrane - 2010 - Bioethics 24 (5):234-241.
Added to PP index
2010-08-10

Total downloads
108 ( #47,987 of 2,197,306 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #44,170 of 2,197,306 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature