Contemporary Hylomorphisms: On the Matter of Form

Ancient Philosophy Today 2 (2):113-144 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

As there is currently a neo-Aristotelian revival currently taking place within contemporary metaphysics and dispositions, or causal powers are now being routinely utilised in theories of causality and modality, more attention is beginning to be paid to a central Aristotelian concern: the metaphysics of substantial unity, and the doctrine of hylomorphism. In this paper, I distinguish two strands of hylomorphism present in the contemporary literature and argue that not only does each engender unique conceptual difficulties, but neither adequately captures the metaphysics of Aristotelian hylomorphism. Thus both strands of contemporary hylomorphism, I argue, fundamentally misunderstand what substantial unity amounts to in the hylomorphic framework – namely, the metaphysical inseparability of matter and form.

Similar books and articles

A Biologically Informed Hylomorphism.Christopher J. Austin - 2017 - In William M. R. Simpson, Robert Charles Koons & Nicholas Teh (eds.), Neo-Aristotelian Perspectives on Contemporary Science. New York: Routledge. pp. 185-210.
Hylomorphism, New Mechanisms, and Explanations in Biology, Neuroscience, and Psychology.Daniel De Haan - 2017 - In William M. R. Simpson, Robert Charles Koons & Nicholas Teh (eds.), Neo-Aristotelian Perspectives on Contemporary Science. New York: Routledge. pp. 293–326.
Contemporary Hylomorphism.Andrew M. Bailey & Shane Wilkins - 2018 - Oxford Bibliographies 3:1-12.
Hylomorphism and Complex Properties.Graham Renz - 2020 - Metaphysica 21 (2):179-197.
Hylomorphism: what’s not to like?John Heil - 2018 - Synthese 198 (Suppl 11):2657-2670.
Prime Matter and Modern Physics.William M. R. Simpson - 2024 - Ancient Philosophy Today 6 (1):1-5.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-09-30

Downloads
1,426 (#8,515)

6 months
356 (#6,453)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Christopher J. Austin
Durham University

Citations of this work

Forms Are Not Emergent Powers.Graham Renz - forthcoming - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy.
Do Substances Have Formal Parts?Graham Renz - forthcoming - Analytic Philosophy.
Teleological powers.Michele Paolini Paoletti - 2021 - Analytic Philosophy 62 (4):336-358.
Whence the Form?Graham Renz - forthcoming - Australasian Journal of Philosophy.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The structure of objects.Kathrin Koslicki - 2008 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Parts of Classes.David K. Lewis - 1991 - Mind 100 (3):394-397.
Material Beings.Peter Van Inwagen - 1990 - Philosophy 67 (259):126-127.

View all 51 references / Add more references