Structural Powers and the Homeodynamic Unity of Organisms

In William M. R. Simpson, Robert C. Koons & Nicholas J. Teh (eds.), Neo-Aristotelian Perspectives on Contemporary Science. Routledge. pp. 169-184 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Although they are continually compositionally reconstituted and reconfigured, organisms nonetheless persist as ontologically unified beings over time – but in virtue of what? A common answer is: in virtue of their continued possession of the capacity for morphological invariance which persists through, and in spite of, their mereological alteration. While we acknowledge that organisms‟ capacity for the “stability of form” – homeostasis - is an important aspect of their diachronic unity, we argue that this capacity is derived from, and grounded in a more primitive one – namely, the homeodynamic capacity for the “specified variation of form”. In introducing a novel type of causal power – a „structural power‟ – we claim that it is the persistence of their dynamic potential to produce a specified series of structurally adaptive morphologies which grounds organisms‟ privileged status as metaphysically “one over many” over time.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Organisms, activity, and being: on the substance of process ontology.Christopher J. Austin - 2020 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 10 (2):1-21.
From potency to act: hyloenergeism.Jeremy W. Skrzypek - 2019 - Synthese 198 (Suppl 11):2691-2716.
St. Thomas Aquinas on Properties and the Powers of the Soul.Richard W. Field - 1984 - Laval Théologique et Philosophique 40 (2):203-215.
Suárez's Metaphysics of Active Powers.Jacob Tuttle - 2020 - Review of Metaphysics 74 (1):43-80.
Contemporary Hylomorphisms: On the Matter of Form.Christopher J. Austin - 2020 - Ancient Philosophy Today 2 (2):113-144.
On the Unity of Aristotelian Composite Substance.Qingyun Cao - 2018 - Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 2 (2):67-75.
What Could a Two-Way Power Be?Kim Frost - 2020 - Topoi 39 (5):1141-1153.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-11-03

Downloads
1,365 (#8,725)

6 months
114 (#41,101)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Christopher J. Austin
Durham University
Anna Marmodoro
Durham University

Citations of this work

Aristotle's Ontology of Change.Mark Sentesy - 2020 - Chicago, IL, USA: Northwestern University Press.
From potency to act: hyloenergeism.Jeremy W. Skrzypek - 2019 - Synthese 198 (Suppl 11):2691-2716.
Organisms, activity, and being: on the substance of process ontology.Christopher J. Austin - 2020 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 10 (2):1-21.
Power-ing up neo-aristotelian natural goodness.Ben Page - 2021 - Philosophical Studies 178 (11):3755-3775.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The Mind in Nature.C. B. Martin - 2007 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
Analytical Biology.G. Sommerhof - 1951 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 2 (5):73-74.

View all 25 references / Add more references