Virgil, Aeneid 2. 567–88

Classical Quarterly 11 (3-4):185- (1961)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Few critics can ever have shown more light-hearted thoughtlessness towards an anxious posterity than Servius in his casual preservation of the ‘Helen-episode’, lacking in our ancient manuscripts of Virgil and primarily extant only in this precarious form. A pity that Servius spoke at all, if he could not tell us more; and to make matters worse, he ignored the lines in his commentary. Aelius Donatus says nothing of them. Tiberius Claudius Donatus passes peacefully in his interpretatio from 2. 566 to 2. 589; his prosy conscientiousness nowhere else allows him to skip so much. The passage so rashly preserved forms an exasperating Tummelplatz for students of Virgil: ‘quadereviridoctiiampridem inter se certarunt semperque, ni fallor, certabunt.’ The purpose of this paper is to suggest that Servius told the truth about the lines, and was not planting a forgery on a credulous world

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,953

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Aeneid 1.567–8.Howard Jacobson - 2004 - Classical Quarterly 54 (1):299-300.
Vergil, Aeneid VI. 567–569.W. F. J. Knight - 1930 - The Classical Review 44 (01):5-.
Vergil, Aeneid VI. 567–569.A. I. Wagner & T. J. Haarhoff - 1930 - The Classical Review 44 (05):170-171.
Virgil’s Ecphrasis[REVIEW]Shadi Bartsch - 2000 - The Classical Review 50 (01):47-.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-12-09

Downloads
17 (#894,534)

6 months
4 (#862,463)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references