In this article I formulate a skeptical argument against the possibility of adhering to the divine will in a non-accidental way. In particular, my focus in the article is on a widely embraced modal condition of accidentality, according to which non-accidentality has to do with a person manifesting dispositions that result in a given outcome in a modally robust way. The skeptical argument arises from two observations: first, various authors in the epistemology of religion have argued that it is often not possible to reason reliably about religious matters, and second, non-accidentally adhering to a given norm is often associated with reasoning about the requirements of the norm in question in a reliable way. In addition to pointing out the existence of the argument, I outline strategies in which religious thinkers could reasonably challenge it by denying that reliable reasoning about the requirements of divine will is necessary for adhering to it in a non-accidental manner. Hence, I argue that the possibility of non-accidental adherence to the divine will does not depend solely on whether it is possible to reliably reason about what it requires one to do.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11153-021-09806-x
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,079
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Epistemology of Disagreement: The Good News.David Christensen - 2007 - Philosophical Review 116 (2):187-217.
Reflection and Disagreement.Adam Elga - 2007 - Noûs 41 (3):478–502.

View all 35 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

On Love’s Robustness.Benjamin Ferguson - 2018 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 21 (4):915-925.
Discretion and Domination in Criminal Procedure: Reflections on Pettit.Vincent Chiao - 2016 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 15 (1):92-110.
Piety: Lending a Hand to Euthyphro.William E. Mann - 1998 - Philosophical and Phenomenological Research 58 (1):123-142.
Piety: Lending a Hand to Euthyphro.William E. Mann - 1998 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 58 (1):123-142.
The Philosophical Basis of Algorithmic Recourse.Suresh Venkatasubramanian & Mark Alfano - forthcoming - Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency Conference 2020.
Spinoza on Ceremonial Observances and the Moral Function of Religion. Lemmens - 2010 - Bijdragen. International Journal in Philosophy and Theology (1):51-64.
Divine Temporality, the Trinity, and the Charge of Arianism.R. T. Mullins - 2016 - Journal of Analytic Theology 4:267-290.
Socrates, Piety, and Nominalism.George Rudebusch - 2009 - Skepsis: A Journal for Philosophy and Interdisciplinary Research 20:216-221.
Aristotelian Piety.Sarah Broadie - 2003 - Phronesis 48 (1):54-70.
Hume's Pious Theist: Pamphilus.James Tarrant - 2021 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 19 (2):95-113.


Added to PP index

Total views
9 ( #950,546 of 2,506,037 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #90,541 of 2,506,037 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes