Cognitive Science 33 (6):1036–1058 (2009)
Sensory substitution devices provide through an unusual sensory modality (the substituting modality, e.g., audition) access to features of the world that are normally accessed through another sensory modality (the substituted modality, e.g., vision). In this article, we address the question of which sensory modality the acquired perception belongs to. We have recourse to the four traditional criteria that have been used to define sensory modalities: sensory organ, stimuli, properties, and qualitative experience (Grice, 1962), to which we have added the criteria of behavioral equivalence (Morgan, 1977), dedication (Keeley, 2002), and sensorimotor equivalence (O’Regan & Noe¨, 2001). We discuss which of them are fulfilled by perception through sensory substitution devices and whether this favors the view that perception belongs to the substituting or to the substituted modality. Though the application of a number of criteria might be taken to point to the conclusion that perception with a sensory substitution device belongs to the substituted modality, we argue that the evidence leads to an alternative view on sensory substitution. According to this view, the experience after sensory substitution is a transformation, extension, or augmentation of our perceptual capacities, rather than being something equivalent or reducible to an already existing sensory modality. We develop this view by comparing sensory substitution devices to other ‘‘mind-enhancing tools’’ such as pen and paper, sketchpads, or calculators. An analysis of sensory substitution in terms of mind-enhancing tools unveils it as a thoroughly transforming perceptual experience and as giving rise to a novel form of perceptual interaction with the environment.
|Keywords||Sensory substitution Sensory modalities Neural plasticity|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Cognitive Integration: Mind and Cognition Unbounded.Richard Menary - 2007 - Palgrave-Macmillan.
Natural-Born Cyborgs: Minds, Technologies and the Future of Human Intelligence.Andy Clark - 2003 - Oxford University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Neither Touch nor Vision: Sensory Substitution as Artificial Synaesthesia?Mirko Farina - 2013 - Biology and Philosophy 28 (4):639-655.
Technology and the Body: The (Im)Possibilities of Re-Embodiment. [REVIEW]Helena de Preester - 2011 - Foundations of Science 16 (2):119-137.
Using Minimal Human-Computer Interfaces for Studying the Interactive Development of Social Awareness.Tom Froese, Hiroyuki Iizuka & Takashi Ikegami - 2014 - Frontiers in Psychology 5.
How to Build a Robot That is Conscious and Feels.J. Kevin O'Regan - 2012 - Minds and Machines 22 (2):117-136.
Sensory Substitution is Substitution.Jean‐Rémy Martin & François Le Corre - 2015 - Mind and Language 30 (2):209-233.
Similar books and articles
Substituting the Senses.Julian Kiverstein, Mirko Farina & Andy Clark - forthcoming - In Mohan Matthen (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Philosophy of Perception. Oxford University Press.
Beyond Vision: The Vertical Integration of Sensory Substitution Devices.Ophelia Deroy & Malika Auvray - 2015 - In D. Stokes, M. Matthen & S. Biggs (eds.), Perception and Its Modalities. Oxford University Press.
Visual Experiences in the Blind Induced by an Auditory Sensory Substitution Device.Jamie Ward & Peter Meijer - 2010 - Consciousness and Cognition 19 (1):492-500.
Do Sensory Substitution Extend the Conscious Mind?Julian Kiverstein & Mirko Farina - forthcoming - In Fabio Paglieri (ed.), Consciousness in interaction: the role of the natural and social context in shaping consciousness". Amsterdam: John Benjamins. John Benjamins.
Descartes on the Cognitive Structure of Sensory Experience.Alison Simmons - 2003 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67 (3):549–579.
A Sensorimotor Account of Vision and Visual Consciousness.J. Kevin O'Regan & Alva Noë - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):883-917.
Shape Properties and Perception.Kirk A. Ludwig - 1996 - In Enrique Villanueva (ed.), Philosophical Issues. Atascadero: Ridgeview. pp. 325-350.
Sensory Consciousness Explained in Terms of 'Corporality' and 'Alerting Capacity'.J. O’Regan, Erik Myin & Alva Noë - 2005 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 4 (4):369-387.
Sensory Consciousness Explained (Better) in Terms of 'Corporality' and 'Alerting Capacity'.Erik Myin - 2005 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 4 (4):369-387.
What It is Like to See: A Sensorimotor Theory of Perceptual Experience.J. Kevin O'Regan - 2001 - Synthese 129 (1):79-103.
Sensory Qualities, Sensible Qualities, Sensational Qualities.Alex Byrne - 2011 - In Brian McLaughlin, Ansgar Beckermann & Sven Walter (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Mind. Oxford University Press.
Sensory Phenomenology and Perceptual Content.Boyd Millar - 2011 - Philosophical Quarterly 61 (244):558-576.
Added to index2011-05-31
Total downloads66 ( #80,476 of 2,177,988 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #317,698 of 2,177,988 )
How can I increase my downloads?