Medical Humanities 31 (2):101-104 (2005)

Abstract
Next SectionThe controversy over retained organs, arising from the Bristol and Alder Hey findings about postmortem uses of body parts, has revealed a gulf between medical and lay understandings of the human body and its relationship with the human person. There is a clear utility in having a “doctor’s story”, which is different from the way patients and their families understand the significance of the body, since this enables medical diagnosis and treatment to be effective. When, however, the medical narrative intrudes uncritically into areas where the key issue is the integration of the body with the person, experienced or remembered, things go badly wrong with communications in medicine. For the lay person disrespectful treatment of the body of a loved one represents a personal attack. In this respect, strong emotion, seen as irrelevant or distracting by scientific medicine, is a central aspect of the narrative concerned with loss of a loved person. For doctor and lay person alike, a narrative of the self which pays proper attention to the embodiment of the self, offers the possibility of a genuinely humane medicine
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1136/jmh.2005.000215
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,042
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

What is Good Medical Ethics? A Clinician's Perspective.Wing May Kong - 2015 - Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (1):79-82.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-08-30

Total views
25 ( #439,565 of 2,454,438 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,269 of 2,454,438 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes