Cloning and Genetic Parenthood

Abstract
This paper explores the implications of human reproductive cloning for our notions of parenthood. Cloning comes in numerous varieties, depending on the kind of cell to be cloned, the age of the source at the time the clone is created, the intended social relationship, if any, between source and clone, and whether the clone is to be one of one, or one of many, genetically identical individuals alive at a time. The moral and legal character of an act of cloning may, moreover, differ in light of these distinctions. Surprisingly, however, reproductive cloning in all its variety seems to undermine the view of parenthood that is most popular among proponents of reproductive technology in the bioethics literature. This view, geneticism, has much to recommend it. I will show, however, that as commonly understood, geneticism is incompatible with the reproductive view of cloning. I then canvass alternative accounts of parenthood—namely, conventionalism, gestationalism, and intentionalism—but none succeeds in explaining reproductive cloning. I thus return to a reconstructed version of geneticism. I argue that the problem for geneticism rests not with the notion of genetic parenthood as such but with a particular, flawed, understanding of it, which I call informational geneticism. Informational geneticism should be rejected in favor of a “physicalistic” version of geneticism, which treats genes as particular objects, not abstract types, and takes seriously the essentially embodied character of reproduction. For these reasons, physicalistic geneticism survives the challenge represented by reproductive cloning. Additionally, physicalistic geneticism accommodates attractive aspects of competing views of parenthood, meeting some powerful objections in the process
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0963180103124097
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,798
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Therapeutic Cloning and Reproductive Liberty.Robert Sparrow - 2009 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 33 (2):1-17.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
"Are You My Mommy?" On the Genetic Basis of Parenthood.Avery Kolers & Tim Bayne - 2001 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 18 (3):273–285.
The Identity of Clones.Kathinka Evers - 1999 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 24 (1):67 – 76.
New Dog: Old Tricks.Mark Greene - 2002 - Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 5 (3):239-242.
Genes, Gestation, and Social Norms.Derek Ettinger - 2012 - Law and Philosophy 31 (3):243-268.
Telomeres and the Ethics of Human Cloning.Fritz Allhoff - 2004 - American Journal of Bioethics 4 (2):29 – 31.
Ethical Issues in Livestock Cloning.Paul B. Thompson - 1999 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 11 (3):197-217.
Genetic Morality.David Shaw - 2006 - Peter Lang.
Added to PP index
2010-08-24

Total downloads
17 ( #293,472 of 2,202,423 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #61,798 of 2,202,423 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature