Artificial Intelligence and Law 30 (2):245-289 (2022)

In this work we study, design, and evaluate computational methods to support interpretation of statutory terms. We propose a novel task of discovering sentences for argumentation about the meaning of statutory terms. The task models the analysis of past treatment of statutory terms, an exercise lawyers routinely perform using a combination of manual and computational approaches. We treat the discovery of sentences as a special case of ad hoc document retrieval. The specifics include retrieval of short texts, specialized document types, and, above all, the unique definition of document relevance provided in detailed annotation guidelines. To support our experiments we assembled a data set comprising 42 queries which we plan to release to the public in the near future in order to support further research. Most importantly, we investigate the feasibility of developing a system that responds to a query with a list of sentences that mention the term in a way that is useful for understanding and elaborating its meaning. This is accomplished by a systematic assessment of different features that model the sentences’ usefulness for interpretation. We combine features into a compound measure that accounts for multiple aspects. The definition of the task, the assembly of the data set, and the detailed task analysis provide a solid foundation for employing a learning-to-rank approach.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10506-021-09293-5
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,039
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Argumentation Mining.Raquel Mochales & Marie-Francine Moens - 2011 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 19 (1):1-22.

View all 9 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Structuring of Legal Knowledge in Lois.Wim Peters, Maria-Teresa Sagri & Daniela Tiscornia - 2007 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 15 (2):117-135.
Innovative Techniques for Legal Text Retrieval.Marie-Francine Moens - 2001 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 9 (1):29-57.
A Task-Based Interface to Legal Databases.Luuk Matthijssen - 1998 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 6 (1):81-103.
Text Retrieval in the Legal World.Howard Turtle - 1995 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 3 (1-2):5-54.


Added to PP index

Total views
9 ( #950,462 of 2,505,726 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #209,579 of 2,505,726 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes