According to Kant, there are limits to possible hope. For example, hope for a contradiction is obviously not a logically possible hope. However, Kant goes much further and restricts possible hope to what can be possibly experienced. The line between what can and cannot be constructed as an image in space and time limits what can be thought rather than what can be merely mentioned. The apparently modern distinction between use and mention (generally attributed to Frege) is used by Kant to distinguish phenomena and noumena as well as real and fictitious concepts. I propose a definition of hope that is consistent with Kant’s concept of reasonable and unreasonable hopes. I then consider some applications of this definition to Kant’s view of world peace, grace, and miracles. Despite notions of secondorder hope and transcendental hope, all possible hope lies within the limits of possible experience
|Keywords||Conference Proceedings Contemporary Philosophy General Interest|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Kant and Richard Schaeffler's Catholic Theology of Hope.Elizabeth C. Galbraith - 1996 - Philosophy and Theology 9 (3-4):333-350.
What is It to Lose Hope?Matthew Ratcliffe - 2013 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 12 (4):597-614.
Hope: The Power of Wish and Possibility.Maria Miceli & Cristiano Castelfranchi - 2010 - Theory and Psychology 20 (2):251-276.
Hope as Virtue: Opens Up a New Space for Exploring Hopefulness at the End of Life and Raises Some Interesting Questions.Daniel Munday - forthcoming - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 19 (3):187-189.
Hope Against Hope: Philosophies, Cultures and Politics of Possibility and Doubt.Janet Horrigan & Ed Wiltse (eds.) - 2010 - Rodopi.
Added to index2012-03-18
Total downloads44 ( #118,732 of 2,172,025 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #46,502 of 2,172,025 )
How can I increase my downloads?