Courage, Caution and Heaven's Gate

Abstract
The criteria of “forced, live, and momentous options,” as William James utilized them in his pragmatic defense of religious belief, cannot, I argue, both support religious pluralism and acknowledge lessons about failure of epistemic responsibility in Heaven’s Gate-followers. But I attempt to re-vitalize the pragmatic argument, showing it capable of walking this narrow line. I proceed (1) by developing the distinction and relationship between a commitment to a particular religious system or community, and a commitment to the generic “religious hypothesis” itself; and (2) by explicating and expanding upon the “experimental” status—and associated pragmatic criteria for success or failure—that James already recognized for commitments to particular religious communities. I thus show how the “pragmatic argument” takes on heightened significance—and renewed promise—in light of problems associated with New Age and so-called “cult” religiosity.
Keywords Conference Proceedings  Contemporary Philosophy  General Interest
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 978-1-889680-19-4  
DOI wcp201999475
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 28,233
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Does a 'Cosmic Consciousness' Exist? Immortality and Ethics in James' Religious Pragmatism.Tadd Ruetenik - 2006 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 42 (3):417-430.
Peirce's Pragmatic Theology and Stoic Religious Ethics1.John R. Shook - 2011 - Journal of Religious Ethics 39 (2):344-363.
Experience, Experimentalism, and Religious Overbelief.Sandra B. Rosenthal - 2006 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 8:129-134.
The Will to Believe.James William - 1960 - Dover Publications.
Motivated Contextualism.David Henderson - 2009 - Philosophical Studies 142 (1):119 - 131.
The Divine Command Theory of Mozi.Yong Li - 2006 - Asian Philosophy 16 (3):237 – 245.
Possibility and Permission? Intellectual Character, Inquiry, and the Ethics of Belief.Guy Axtell - 2014 - In Pihlstrom S. & Rydenfelt H. (eds.), William James on Religion. (Palgrave McMillan “Philosophers in Depth” Series.
The Challenge of William James's Philosophy of Religion.Celal Türer - 2006 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 8:25-30.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-01-09

Total downloads

33 ( #156,540 of 2,172,903 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #172,439 of 2,172,903 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums