Are Frege cases exceptions to intentional generalizations?

Canadian Journal of Philosophy 31 (1):1-22 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This piece criticizes Fodor's argument (in The Elm and the Expert, 1994) for the claim that Frege cases should be treated as exceptions to (broad) psychological generalizations rather than as counterexamples.

Other Versions

No versions found

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
1,316 (#14,244)

6 months
154 (#30,937)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Philip Robbins
University of Missouri, Columbia
Murat Aydede
University of British Columbia

Citations of this work

The language of thought hypothesis.Murat Aydede - 2010 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
The edenic theory of reference.Elmar Unnsteinsson - 2019 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 62 (3):276-308.
The Causal Inefficacy of Content.Gabriel M. A. Segal - 2009 - Mind and Language 24 (1):80-102.

View all 11 citations / Add more citations