Has Austin refuted the sense-datum theory?

Synthese 17 (June):117-140 (1967)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords Epistemology  Perception  Sense Data  Austin
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00485023
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 26,178
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Perception and Computation.Jonathan Cohen - 2010 - Philosophical Issues 20 (1):96-124.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Austin on Sense-Data: Ordinary Language Analysis as 'Therapy'.Eugen Fischer - 2005 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 70 (1):67-99.
Austin on Perception.W. F. R. Hardie - 1963 - Philosophy 38 (July):253-263.
Sense-Data and J.L. Austin: A Re-Examination.A. D. P. Kalansuriya - 1981 - Indian Philosophical Quarterly 8 (April):357-371.
Austin and the Argument From Illusion.Roderick Firth - 1964 - Philosophical Review 73 (July):372-382.
Adjusters and Sense-Data.Sam C. Coval & D. D. Todd - 1972 - American Philosophical Quarterly 9 (January):107-112.
Perception.Howard M. Robinson - 1994 - New York: Routledge.
Metaphysics and Common Sense.A. J. Ayer - 1969 - San Francisco, Freeman, Cooper.
Austin and Perception.Charles Sayward - 2001 - Acta Analytica 16 (27):169-193.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

270 ( #11,447 of 2,153,479 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

18 ( #22,940 of 2,153,479 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums