Strategyproof peer selection using randomization, partitioning, and apportionment

, , , &
Artificial Intelligence 275 (C):295-309 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1016/j.artint.2019.06.004

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Algorithms for strategyproof classification.Reshef Meir, Ariel D. Procaccia & Jeffrey S. Rosenschein - 2012 - Artificial Intelligence 186 (C):123-156.
A Bayesian Argument in Favor of Randomization.Zeno G. Swijtink - 1982 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:159-168.
The Role of Randomization in Bayesian and Frequentist Design of Clinical Trial.Paola Berchialla, Dario Gregori & Ileana Baldi - 2019 - Topoi 38 (2):469-475.
Randomization in Experimental Design.Zeno Gerhard Swijtink - 1982 - Dissertation, Stanford University
Response to open Peer commentaries on “must research participants understand randomization?”.David Wendler - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (2):W1 – W2.
Fixing balanced knockout and double elimination tournaments.Haris Aziz, Serge Gaspers, Simon Mackenzie, Nicholas Mattei, Paul Stursberg & Toby Walsh - 2018 - Artificial Intelligence 262 (C):1-14.
Must research participants understand randomization?David Wendler - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (2):3 – 8.
Implications of the apportionment of human genetic diversity for the apportionment of human phenotypic diversity.Michael D. Edge & Noah A. Rosenberg - 2015 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 52:32-45.
Double auctions with no-loss constrained traders.Nejat Anbarci & Jaideep Roy - 2018 - Theory and Decision 84 (1):1-9.
A comparison of two methods of event randomization in probability learning.Mari R. Jones & Jerome L. Myers - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 72 (6):909.
Direct Inference and Randomization.Isaac Levi - 1982 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:447 - 463.
Why Randomized Interventional Studies.Adam La Caze - 2013 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 38 (4):352-368.
On the function of muscle and reflex partitioning.Uwe Windhorst, Thomas M. Hamm & Douglas G. Stuart - 1989 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12 (4):629-645.
Promoting F.A.I.T.H. in Peer Review: Five Core Attributes of Effective Peer Review.Turner Leigh - 2003 - Journal of Academic Ethics 1 (2):181-188.
Promoting F.A.I.T.h. In Peer review: Five core attributes of effective Peer review. [REVIEW]Leigh Turner - 2003 - Journal of Academic Ethics 1 (2):181-188.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-12-22

Downloads
16 (#880,136)

6 months
10 (#257,583)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references