Worlds, Capabilities and Well-Being

Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 13 (4):377-392 (2010)

Authors
H. E. Baber
University of San Diego
Abstract
Critics suggest that without some "objective" account of well-being we cannot explain why satisfying some preferences is, as we believe, better than satisfying others, why satisfying some preferences may leave us on net worse off or why, in a range of cases, we should reject life-adjustment in favor of life-improvement. I defend a subjective welfarist understanding of well-being against such objections by reconstructing the Amartya Sen's capability approach as a preferentist account of well-being. According to the proposed account preference satisfaction alone—possible as well as actual—is of value. States of affairs contribute to well-being because and to the extent that they satisfy actual or nearby possible preferences, and are fruitful, that is, compatible with a range states that satisfy further actual or nearby possible preferences. The proposed account solves the problem of adaptive preference. Individuals whose preferences are "deformed" are satisfied with fruitless states of affairs, which constrain their options so that they are incapable of satisfying a wide range of nearby possible preferences—preferences they "could easily have had." Recognizing the value of capabilities as well as actual attainments allows us to explain why individuals who satisfy "deformed" or perverse preferences may not on net benefit from doing so. More fundamentally, it explains why some states are, as Sen suggests, bad, awful or gruesome while others are good, excellent or superb without appeal to any objective account of value
Keywords Political Philosophy   Ethics
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10677-009-9207-1
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 39,607
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Women and Human Development.Martha C. Nussbaum - 2003 - Mind 112 (446):372-375.
Adaptive Preference.H. E. Baber - 2007 - Social Theory and Practice 33 (1):105-126.

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Robot Caregivers: Harbingers of Expanded Freedom for All? [REVIEW]Yvette Pearson - 2010 - Ethics and Information Technology 12 (3):277-288.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Health Care, Capabilities, and AI Assistive Technologies.Mark Coeckelbergh - 2010 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 13 (2):181-190.
Branching Versus Divergent Possible Worlds.Jiri Benovsky - 2005 - Kriterion - Journal of Philosophy 19 (1):12-20.
The Ontology of Impossible Worlds.David A. Vander Laan - 1997 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 38 (4):597-620.
The Situational Context on the Nature of Political Philosophy.Yoram Levy - 2005 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 8 (5):535-556.
The Political Egalitarian’s Dilemma.Fabienne Peter - 2007 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 10 (4):373-387.
An Alternative Model of Political Reasoning.F. M. Frohock - 2006 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 9 (1):27-64.
Secularism, Equality, and Political Legitimacy.Jon Mahoney - 2010 - Journal of Value Inquiry 44 (1):17-30.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-10-21

Total views
143 ( #47,417 of 2,325,373 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
19 ( #34,550 of 2,325,373 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature