An Extension of Classical Transformational Grammar

Abstract

0. Introductory remarks. I assume that every serious theory of language must give some explicit account of the relationship between expressions in the language described and expressions in some interpreted language which spells out the semantics of the language.1 Let's call this relationship the translation relation. Theories differ as to how this relation is specified. In the Aspects theory of syntax, taken together with a Katz-Postal view of "semantic rules", it was assumed that the relation was defined on deep structures. Serious problems led to modifications of this view in several directions. Chomsky's latest papers assume that a modified 'intermediate structure' is transformed by rules of interpretation to a level of representation called 'logical form'. Common to all of these approaches is the assumption that the translation rules are defined initially on syntactic structures of one sort or another. Let us call this assumption the configurational hypothesis: the translation rules all have the form: [183]

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 99,362

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

The Theory of Grammatical Relations. [REVIEW]L. J. - 1982 - Review of Metaphysics 36 (1):162-162.
Essays on Form and Interpretation. [REVIEW]L. J. - 1978 - Review of Metaphysics 32 (1):131-131.
In Defense of Theory.Ray Jackendoff - 2017 - Cognitive Science 41 (S2):185-212.
The semantics of syntax: a minimalist approach to grammar.Denis Bouchard - 1995 - Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press.
Are Logical Languages Compositional?Marcus Kracht - 2013 - Studia Logica 101 (6):1319-1340.
Approaches to Natural Language. [REVIEW]L. J. - 1974 - Review of Metaphysics 27 (3):611-612.
Rules and grammar.G. P. Baker & P. M. S. Hacker - 1980 - In Gordon P. Baker & P. M. S. Hacker (eds.), Wittgenstein: Rules, Grammar and Necessity. New York, NY, USA: Blackwell. pp. 41–80.
Analysis of Interpretation Rules.Margit Gaffal - 2019 - Dókos. Philosophical Review 23:7-46.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-12-22

Downloads
134 (#147,762)

6 months
6 (#720,360)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Type-driven translation.Ewan Klein & Ivan A. Sag - 1985 - Linguistics and Philosophy 8 (2):163 - 201.
Compositionality is not the problem.Wilfrid Hodges - 1998 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 6:7.
What a Rational Parser Would Do.John T. Hale - 2011 - Cognitive Science 35 (3):399-443.
Formal Semantics: Origins, Issues, Early Impact.Barbara H. Partee - 2010 - The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication 6 (1).

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references