ACTL Semantics: Compositionality and Morphosemantics: I: Syntactic and semantic assumptions: compositionality

Abstract

Theme of two lectures: how does meaning work in grammar and lexicon? General question: Are morphemes the minimal meaningful units of language? Are the meanings of the parts of words of the same kind as those of syntax? The answer to this question has an obvious bearing on the question of the derivation of complex words "in the syntax." Is the split between syntax and morphology the proper division for asking the previous question? Answer: No. The crucial distinction is that between grammar and lexicon. Framework: model theoretic semantics and constructive categorial syntax..

Other Versions

unknown Bach, Emmon (unknown) "ACTL Semantics: Compositionality and Morphosemantics: II: Words, morphemes, constructions, interpretations".

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 99,410

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-12-04

Downloads
53 (#333,078)

6 months
5 (#911,049)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references