Conversational Impliciture

Mind and Language 9 (2):124-162 (1994)
Authors
Kent Bach
San Francisco State University
Abstract
Confusion in terms inspires confusion in concepts. When a relevant distinction is not clearly marked or not marked at all, it is apt to be blurred or even missed altogether in our thinking. This is true in any area of inquiry, pragmatics in particular. No one disputes that there are various ways in which what is communicated in an utterance can go beyond sentence meaning. The problem is to catalog the ways. It is generally recognized that linguistic meaning underdetermines speaker meaning because of the need for disambiguation and reference assignment and because people can speak figuratively or indirectly. But philosophers and linguists are coming to recognize that these are not the only ways. The situation may be described in Gricean terms: the distinction between what is said and what is implicated is not exhaustive. Charting the middle ground between the two will require attending to specific examples, noting their distinctive features, and articulating the relevant concepts. That is what I aim to do here. The basic idea will be to distinguish not only the implied from the explicit but the implicit from the implied.
Keywords philpapers: predicates and context-dependence
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1468-0017.1994.tb00220.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 35,527
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Studies in the Way of Words.H. Paul Grice - 1989 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Relevance.D. Sperber & D. Wilson - 1995 - Blackwell.

View all 24 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Conversational Exculpature.Daniel Hoek - 2018 - Philosophical Review 127 (2):151-196.
Dispositions and Habituals.Michael Fara - 2005 - Noûs 39 (1):43–82.
Contextualism and Warranted Assertibility Manoeuvres.Jessica Brown - 2006 - Philosophical Studies 130 (3):407 - 435.
Speaking of Knowing.Patrick Rysiew - 2007 - Noûs 41 (4):627–662.

View all 131 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Pragmatics.Charles Travis - 1997 - In Bob Hale & Crispin Wright (eds.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Language. Blackwell. pp. 87--107.
Testing for Context-Dependence. [REVIEW]John Hawthorne - 2006 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 73 (2):443–450.
Context Ex Machina.Kent Bach - 2005 - In Zoltán Gendler Szabó (ed.), Semantics Versus Pragmatics. Oxford University Press. pp. 15--44.
Indexical Predicates.Daniel Rothschild & Gabriel Segal - 2009 - Mind and Language 24 (4):467-493.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
545 ( #4,817 of 2,287,541 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
13 ( #34,531 of 2,287,541 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature