Conversational Impliciture

Mind and Language 9 (2):124-162 (1994)
Confusion in terms inspires confusion in concepts. When a relevant distinction is not clearly marked or not marked at all, it is apt to be blurred or even missed altogether in our thinking. This is true in any area of inquiry, pragmatics in particular. No one disputes that there are various ways in which what is communicated in an utterance can go beyond sentence meaning. The problem is to catalog the ways. It is generally recognized that linguistic meaning underdetermines speaker meaning because of the need for disambiguation and reference assignment and because people can speak figuratively or indirectly. But philosophers and linguists are coming to recognize that these are not the only ways. The situation may be described in Gricean terms: the distinction between what is said and what is implicated is not exhaustive. Charting the middle ground between the two will require attending to specific examples, noting their distinctive features, and articulating the relevant concepts. That is what I aim to do here. The basic idea will be to distinguish not only the implied from the explicit but the implicit from the implied.
Keywords philpapers: predicates and context-dependence
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1468-0017.1994.tb00220.x
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 32,688
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Studies in the Way of Words.H. P. Grice - 1989 - Harvard University Press.
Relevance.D. Sperber & D. Wilson - 1995 - Blackwell.

View all 24 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Conversational Exculpature.Daniel Hoek - 2018 - Philosophical Review 127 (2):151-196.
Embedding Irony and the Semantics/Pragmatics Distinction.Mihaela Popa-Wyatt - 2018 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy:1-26.
Dispositions and Habituals.Michael Fara - 2005 - Noûs 39 (1):43–82.

View all 125 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Pragmatics.Charles Travis - 1997 - In Bob Hale & Crispin Wright (eds.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Language. Blackwell. pp. 87--107.
Testing for Context-Dependence. [REVIEW]John Hawthorne - 2006 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 73 (2):443–450.
Context Ex Machina.Kent Bach - 2005 - In Zoltán Gendler Szabó (ed.), Semantics Versus Pragmatics. Oxford University Press. pp. 15--44.
Indexical Predicates.Daniel Rothschild & Gabriel Segal - 2009 - Mind and Language 24 (4):467-493.
Added to PP index

Total downloads
534 ( #4,267 of 2,237,285 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
19 ( #24,126 of 2,237,285 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature