Studia Logica 101 (1):1-9 (2013)

Authors
Andrew Bacon
University of Southern California
Abstract
In recent years there has been a revitalised interest in non-classical solutions to the semantic paradoxes. In this paper I show that a number of logics are susceptible to a strengthened version of Curry's paradox. This can be adapted to provide a proof theoretic analysis of the omega-inconsistency in Lukasiewicz's continuum valued logic, allowing us to better evaluate which logics are suitable for a naïve truth theory. On this basis I identify two natural subsystems of Lukasiewicz logic which individually, but not jointly, lack the problematic feature.
Keywords Lukasiewicz logic  Curry's paradox  Semantic paradoxes  Non-classical logic  contraction
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s11225-012-9373-3
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Saving Truth From Paradox.Hartry Field - 2008 - Oxford University Press.
Spandrels of Truth.J. C. Beall - 2009 - Oxford University Press.
How to Be Really Contraction Free.Greg Restall - 1993 - Studia Logica 52 (3):381 - 391.
The Liar Paradox and Fuzzy Logic.Petr Hájek, Jeff Paris & John Shepherdson - 2000 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 65 (1):339-346.
Routes to Triviality.Susan Rogerson & Greg Restall - 2004 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 33 (4):421-436.

View all 10 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Fusion and Confusion.Graham Priest - 2015 - Topoi 34 (1):55-61.
Paths to Triviality.Tore Øgaard - 2016 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 45 (3):237-276.
Truth Without Standard Models: Some Conceptual Problems Reloaded.Eduardo Barrio & Bruno Da Ré - 2018 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 28 (1):122-139.
Contraction, Infinitary Quantifiers, and Omega Paradoxes.Bruno Da Ré & Lucas Rosenblatt - 2018 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 47 (4):611-629.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Two Flavors of Curry’s Paradox.Jc Beall & Julien Murzi - 2013 - Journal of Philosophy 110 (3):143-165.
Validity Curry Strengthened.Lionel Shapiro - 2013 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 2 (1):100-107.
Natural Deduction and Curry's Paradox.Susan Rogerson - 2007 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 36 (2):155 - 179.
Variations on a Theme of Curry.Lloyd Humberstone - 2006 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 47 (1):101-131.
Disarming a Paradox of Validity.Hartry Field - 2017 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 58 (1):1-19.
Curry, Yablo and Duality.Roy T. Cook - 2009 - Analysis 69 (4):612-620.
Curry's Paradox.Lionel Shapiro & Jc Beall - 2017 - Edward N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. CSLI Publications.
Relevant First-Order Logic LP# and Curry’s Paradox Resolution.Jaykov Foukzon - 2015 - Pure and Applied Mathematics Journal Volume 4, Issue 1-1, January 2015 DOI: 10.11648/J.Pamj.S.2015040101.12.
Computer Implication and the Curry Paradox.Wayne Aitken & Jeffrey A. Barrett - 2004 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 33 (6):631-637.
Inconsistency in Natural Languages.Jody Azzouni - 2013 - Synthese 190 (15):3175-3184.
Naïve Proof and Curry’s Paradox.Massimilano Carrara - 2018 - In Alessandro Giordani & Ciro de Florio (eds.), From Arithmetic to Metaphysics: A Path Through Philosophical Logic. Berlin: De Gruyter. pp. 61-68.
Faithfulness for Naive Validity.Ulf Hlobil - 2019 - Synthese 196 (11):4759-4774.
Curry's Paradox in Contractionless Constructive Logic.Akama Seiki - 1996 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 25 (2):135 - 150.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-05-11

Total views
656 ( #7,298 of 2,340,266 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
69 ( #8,063 of 2,340,266 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes