Sophia 48 (2):105-118 (2009)
A central theme in the Christian contemplative tradition is that knowing God is much more like ‘unknowing’ than it is like possessing rationally acceptable beliefs. Knowledge of God is expressed, in this tradition, in metaphors of woundedness, darkness, silence, suffering, and desire. Philosophers of religion, on the other hand, tend to explore the possibilities of knowing God in terms of rational acceptability, epistemic rights, cognitive responsibility, and propositional belief. These languages seem to point to very different accounts of how it is that we come to know God, and a very different range of critical concepts by which the truth of such knowledge can be assessed. In this paper, I begin to explore what might be at stake in these different languages of knowing God, drawing particularly on Alvin Plantinga’s epistemology of Christian belief. I will argue that his is a distorted account of the epistemology of Christian belief, and that this has implications for his project of demonstrating the rational acceptability of Christian faith for the 21st century.
|Keywords||Alvin Plantinga Epistemology of Christian belief Christian spirituality Unknowing|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Religion and Friendly Fire Examining Assumptions in Contemporary Philosophy of Religion.D. Z. Phillips - 2004
Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articles
The Cognitive Science of Religion/Atheism and its Impact on Plantinga's Reformed Epistemology.Richard Jonathan Sagar - unknown
Can Religious Unbelief Be Proper Function Rational?Michael Czapkay Sudduth - 1999 - Faith and Philosophy 16 (3):297-314.
Moral Difficulties in Plantinga's Model of Warranted Christian Belief.Michael W. Austin - 2005 - Philosophy and Theology 17 (1-2):121-132.
Added to index2009-05-02
Total downloads107 ( #46,732 of 2,171,974 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #173,676 of 2,171,974 )
How can I increase my downloads?