History and equilibrium: A partial defense of equilibrium economics

Journal of Economic Methodology 11 (3):291-305 (2004)
Abstract
This paper responds to the argument, made by many heterodox economists, that equilibrium theory should be abandoned in favor of theories that pay more attention to history. It considers some of the main ways in which the concept of equilibrium has been understood in economics, and the reasons why there has been confusion in discussions of equilibrium. The conclusion is drawn that the focus should be less on equilibrium as a concept than on equilibrium analysis as a method, and limited defense of this method is offered.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/1350178042000252974
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 26,692
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Fixing Ideas: How Research is Constrained by Mandated Formalism.Arthur M. Diamond - 2009 - Journal of Economic Methodology 16 (2):191-206.
The Concept(s) and Controversies of Equilibrium.Lina Eriksson - 2008 - Biology and Philosophy 23 (3):447-454.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
On the Inconsistency of Equilibrium Refinement.Werner Güth - 2002 - Theory and Decision 53 (4):371-392.
Decisions, Games and Equilibrium Solutions.William Harper - 1988 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:344 - 362.
Boltzmann, Gibbs, and the Concept of Equilibrium.David Lavis - 2008 - Philosophy of Science 75 (5):682-696.
Distributive Justice and the Rules of the Corporation.John H. Beck - 2005 - Business Ethics Quarterly 15 (3):355-362.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2012-02-20

Total downloads

23 ( #216,497 of 2,158,427 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #193,773 of 2,158,427 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums