Perverted Space-Time Geodesy in Einstein’s Views on Geometry

Philosophia Scientiae 22:137-162 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A perverted space-time geodesy results from the notions of variable rods and clocks, which are taken to have their length and rates affected by the gravitational field. On the other hand, what we might call a concrete geodesy relies on the notions of invariable unit-measuring rods and clocks. In fact, this is a basic assumption of general relativity. Variable rods and clocks lead to a perverted geodesy in the sense that a curved space-time might be seen as arising from the departure from the Minkowskian space-time as an effect of the gravitational field on the rate of clocks and the length of rods. In the case of a concrete geodesy we have “directly” a curved space-time whose curvature can be determined using (invariable) unit-measuring rods and clocks. In this paper, we will make the case for the plausibility that Einstein's views on geometry in relation to general relativity are permeated by a perverted geodesy.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

‘But one must not legalize the mentioned sin’: Phenomenological vs. dynamical treatments of rods and clocks in Einstein׳s thought.Marco Giovanelli - 2014 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 48 (1):20-44.
Über einen methodisch geordneten aufbau der speziellen relativitätstheorie.Manfred Buth - 1998 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 29 (1):21-36.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-07-28

Downloads
412 (#67,332)

6 months
122 (#41,018)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Mario Bacelar Valente
Pablo de Olavide University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Evolution of Physics.Albert Einstein & Léopold Infeld - 1939 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 46 (1):173-173.
What was Einstein's Principle of Equivalence?John Norton - 1985 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 16 (3):203.
‘But one must not legalize the mentioned sin’: Phenomenological vs. dynamical treatments of rods and clocks in Einstein׳s thought.Marco Giovanelli - 2014 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 48 (1):20-44.
The gravitational red shift as a test of general relativity: History and analysis.John Earman & Clark Glymour - 1980 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 11 (3):175-214.
Proper time and the clock hypothesis in the theory of relativity.Mario Bacelar Valente - 2016 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 6 (2):191-207.

View all 6 references / Add more references