The Monist 102 (2):236-258 (2019)

Theodore Bach
Associate Professor, Bowling Green State University Firelands
There is broad agreement among social researchers and social ontologists that the project of dividing humans into social kinds should be guided by at least two methodological commitments. First, a commitment to what best serves moral and political interests, and second, a commitment to describing accurately the causal structures of social reality. However, researchers have not sufficiently analyzed how these two commitments interact and constrain one another. In the absence of that analysis, several confusions have set in, threatening to undermine shared goals for the responsible modeling of social kinds of humans. This essay first explains the source and substance of these confusions. Then, by distinguishing different value-laden investigative questions into the classification of social kinds of humans, it sets out specific relations of dependence and constraint between empirically-driven investigations and value-driven investigations into social kinds of humans. The result is a more detailed and fruitful framework for thinking about the classification of social kinds that respects both normative interests and mind-independent causal regularities.
Keywords Natural kinds  Gender  Social kinds  Historical kinds  Transgender  Ameliorative analysis  Value in science  Scientific models  Conceptual Engineering
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/monist/onz008
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

An Essay Concerning Human Understanding.John Locke - 1979 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 169 (2):221-222.

View all 26 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Metaphysics of Social Kinds.Rebecca Mason - 2016 - Philosophy Compass 11 (12):841-850.
Mind-Dependent Kinds.Khalidi Muhammad Ali - 2016 - Journal of Social Ontology 2 (2):223-246.
Antirealism and Artefact Kinds.Marzia Soavi - 2009 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 13 (2):93-107.
How We Divide the World.Michael Root - 2000 - Philosophy of Science 67 (3):639.
Three Kinds of Social Kinds.Muhammad Ali Khalidi - 2015 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 90 (1):96-112.
Antirealism and Artefact Kinds.Marzia Soavi - 2009 - Techne 13 (2):93-107.
Metaphysics of Classical and Nonclassical Kinds of Social Realities.Shelud’ko Grigoriy Vladimirovich - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 15:333-336.
Half-Naturalized Social Kinds.Richard W. Miller - 2000 - Philosophy of Science 67 (3):652.
Social Structures and the Ontology of Social Groups.Katherine Ritchie - 2020 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 100 (2):402-424.
Looping Kinds and Social Mechanisms.Jaakko Kuorikoski & Samuli Reijula - 2012 - Sociological Theory 30 (3):187-205.
Two Kinds of Commitments (and Two Kinds of Social Groups).Talbot M. Brewer - 2003 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66 (3):554–583.


Added to PP index

Total views
340 ( #29,881 of 2,499,055 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
45 ( #18,854 of 2,499,055 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes