Authors
Neera K. Badhwar
University of Oklahoma
Abstract
I. Introduction Sex has been thought to reveal the most profound truths about individuals, laying bare their deepest desires and fears to their partners and themselves. In ‘Carnal Knowledge,’ Wendy Doniger states that this view is to be found in the texts of ancient India, in the Hebrew Bible, in Renaissance England and Europe, as well as in contemporary culture, including Hollywood films.1 Indeed, according to Josef Pieper, the original, Hebrew, meaning of `carnal knowledge’ was `immediate togetherness, intimate presence.’ 10 But equally prevalent in both ancient and contemporary culture is the view that sex generates the deepest illusions, hiding people’s true selves behind layers of deception, blindness, deception, or self-deception.2 Tthere is, however, no contradiction in holding both that sexual deception and illusion blindness are widespread, and that sex reveals some profound truths about us. Indeed, if deception or illusion blindness about our sexual desires and fantasies is widespread, one likely explanation is surely that many of us implicitly or explicitly believe that our desires and fantasies say something important about us – or at least that we believe that others believe that they do. There is little reason to hide from ourselves or others that which we regard as unimportant. But while such blindness to or pretence about one’s own or partner’s sexual needs and desires saves one from embarrassment or from the effort to understand and satisfy one’s partner or oneself, it also subverts a central value of any fulfilling personal..
Keywords Mutual visibility  intemperance  insensibility  carnal foolishness  Aristotle  Dangerous Liaisons  objectification
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2007
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Prostitution and the Good of Sex.Sascha Settegast - 2018 - Social Theory and Practice 44 (3):377-403.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Mutilation, Deception, and Sex Changes.M. Lavin - 1987 - Journal of Medical Ethics 13 (2):86-91.
A Sociology of Sex and Sexuality.Gail Hawkes - 1996 - Open University Press.
The Ethics of Sexual Fantasy.Jeffrey Hershfield - 2009 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 23 (1):27-49.
The Structure of Sexual Perversity.Russell Vannoy - 2000 - Philosophy and Theology 12 (2):255-273.
A Theory of Love and Sexual Desire.James Giles - 1994 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 24 (4):339–357.
Loose Women, Lecherous Men: A Feminist Philosophy of Sex.Linda Lemoncheck - 1998 - Philosophical Studies 89 (2-3):369-373.
Sex Hormones and Sexual Desire.James Giles - 2008 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 38 (1):45–66.
Self-Deception and Emotion.Alfred R. Mele - 2000 - Consciousness and Emotion 1 (1):115-137.
Sexual Experience.Nikolay Milkov - 2011 - In McEnvoy Adrienne (ed.), Sex, Love, and Friendship, vol. 2. Rodopi.
Sexual Blindness and Sexual Equality.Bernard R. Boxill - 1980 - Social Theory and Practice 6 (3):281-298.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-12-22

Total views
95 ( #109,024 of 2,432,668 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #170,105 of 2,432,668 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes