Society and Animals 22 (2):111-134 (2014)

Sean Murphy
University of Puget Sound
Using the quasi-experimental setting of the Michael Vick dogfighting case, the researchers employed rich interview content to explore the question, “When a critical event occurs in the animal advocacy field, what motivates advocacy groups to respond?” The investigation reveals that what was thought to be one critical event was in actuality three unique yet interrelated critical events— the revelation of the transgressions; the punishment of the perpetrator; and the decision about whether to ally with the perpetrator in advocacy. The study shows that legitimacy concerns, occasionally paired with reflections on organizational identity, influenced the decision-making of advocacy organizations across all three critical events, as each held the potential either to legitimize or to delegitimize the advocacy organizations and/or the perpetrator
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1163/15685306-12341243
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 54,676
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Animal Liberation.Peter Singer (ed.) - 1977 - Avon Books.
Animal Liberation.Bill Puka & Peter Singer - 1977 - Philosophical Review 86 (4):557.
Introduction: What Are Animal Rights.Cass Sunstein - 2004 - In Cass R. Sunstein & Martha Craven Nussbaum (eds.), Animal Rights: Current Debates and New Directions. Oxford University Press. pp. 3--21.
From Vilification to Accommodation: Making a Common Cause Movement.Lyle Munro - 1999 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 8 (1):46-57.

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Patient Advocacy in Clinical Ethics Consultation.Lisa M. Rasmussen - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (8):1 - 9.
International Advocacy for Information Ethics: The Role of IFLA.Peter Johan Lor - 2007 - International Review of Information Ethics 7:09.
Advocating Procedural Neutrality.Linda Bomstad - 1995 - Teaching Philosophy 18 (3):197-210.
Advocating Procedural Neutrality.Linda Bornstad - 1995 - Teaching Philosophy 18 (3):197-210.
The Role of Advocacy in Civil Society.J. P. Zompetti - 2006 - Argumentation 20 (2):167-183.


Added to PP index

Total views
5 ( #1,120,719 of 2,386,479 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #554,109 of 2,386,479 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes