Moral Agency, Commitment, and Impartiality*: NEERA K. BADHWAR

Social Philosophy and Policy 13 (1):1-26 (1996)

Abstract

Liberal political philosophy presupposes a moral theory according to which the ability to assess and choose conceptions of the good from a universal and impartial moral standpoint is central to the individual's moral identity. This viewpoint is standardly understood by liberals as that of a rational human agent. Such an agent is able to reflect on her ends and pursuits, including those she strongly identifies with, and to understand and take into account the basic interests of others. From the perspective of liberalism as a political morality, the most important of these interests is the interest in maximum, equal liberty for each individual, and thus the most important moral principles are the principles of justice that protect individuals' rights to life and liberty. According to the communitarian critics of liberalism, however, the liberal picture of moral agency is unrealistically abstract. Communitarians object that moral agents in the real world neither choose their conceptions of the good nor occupy a universalistically impartial moral standpoint. Rather, their conceptions of the good are determined chiefly by the communities in which they find themselves, and these conceptions are largely “constitutive” of their particular moral identities. Moral agency is thus “situated” and “particularistic,” and an impartial reflection on the conception of the good that constitutes it is undesirable, if not impossible. Further, communitarians contend, the good is “prior” to the right in the sense that moral norms are derived from, and justified in terms of, the good. An adequate moral and political theory must reflect these facts about moral agency and moral norms.

Download options

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,856

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-31

Downloads
48 (#240,310)

6 months
1 (#386,040)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Neera K. Badhwar
University of Oklahoma

References found in this work

The Schizophrenia of Modern Ethical Theories.Michael Stocker - 1976 - Journal of Philosophy 73 (14):453-466.
Whose Justice? Which Rationality?Alasdair Macintyre - 1988 - Journal of Religious Ethics 16 (2):363-363.

View all 17 references / Add more references

Citations of this work

Virtue Ethics and the Interests of Others.Mark Lebar - 1999 - Dissertation, The University of Arizona
What’s Special About Culture? Identity, Autonomy, and Public Reason.Phil Parvin - 2008 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 11 (3):315-333.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Moral Agency in Other Animals.Paul Shapiro - 2006 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27 (4):357-373.
When is Impartiality Morally Appropriate?Brad Hooker - 2010 - In Brian Feltham & John Cottingham (eds.), Partiality and Impartiality: Morality, Special Relationships, and the Wider World. Oxford University Press. pp. 26-41.
The Student as Moral Agent.Robert Boostrom - 1998 - Journal of Moral Education 27 (2):179-190.
Rational Feelings and Moral Agency.Ido Geiger - 2011 - Kantian Review 16 (2):283-308.
Communitarian and Liberal Themes in Moral Agency and Education.Mark Young & Andrew Sneddon - 2011 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 2 (1):105-120.
Subjectivity and Human Agency.Theodora Bryan - 1995 - Dissertation, Loyola University of Chicago
The Circumstances of Justice: Pluralism, Community, and Friendship.Neera Kapur Badhwar - 1993 - Journal of Political Philosophy 1 (3):250–276.
Moral Agency, Commitment, and Impartiality.Neera K. Badhwar - 1996 - Social Philosophy and Policy 13:1-26.
Social Conceptions of Moral Agency in Hegel and Sellars.David Baumeister - 2017 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 25 (2):249-265.
Two Conceptions of the Highest Good in Kant.Andrews Reath - 1988 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 26 (4):593-619.
Moral Self-Knowledge in Kantian Ethics.Emer O’Hagan - 2009 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 12 (5):525-537.