Politics, Philosophy, and Economics


Authors
Neera K. Badhwar
University of Oklahoma
Abstract
1.1 Are commercial societies unfriendly to friendship? Many critics of commercial societies, from both the left and the right, have thought so. They claim that the freemarket system of property rights, freedom of contract, and other liberty rights – the “negative” right of individuals to peacefully pursue their own ends – is impersonal and dehumanizing, or even inherently divisive and adversarial. Yet (their complaint goes) the psychology and morality of markets and liberty rights pervade far too many relationships in a commercial society, eroding the bonds of personal and civic friendship. My main aim in this paper is to analyze and evaluate this claim. In this section I will give an overview of the critics’ complaints against various features of the freemarket system, discuss the empirical data that might be thought to support their complaints, and show why they largely fail to do so. In Section II I will get to the heart of the matter: the nature of the market and of friendship. I will address the thesis that the modes of valuation proper to production are radically opposed to the modes of valuation proper to friendship, love, sexuality, and so on, arguing that the thesis rests on a misunderstanding of both markets and friendship. A proper understanding of the two reveals that, as voluntary, reciprocal relationships, market relationships and friendship share important moral and psychological properties, and are not the natural enemies, or even the odd bed-fellows, many critics take them to be. In Section III I will address the related thesis that market societies – societies based on the free-market system of..
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 60,044
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Friendship and Commercial Societies.Neera K. Badhwar - 2008 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 7 (3):301-326.
After Philia? Friendship, the Market, and Late Modernity.Lawrence Quill - 2009 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 16 (2):32-43.
Friendship: A Philosophical Reader.Neera Kapur Badhwar (ed.) - 1993 - Cornell University Press.
Friendship and Moral Danger.Dean Cocking & Jeanette Kennett - 2000 - Journal of Philosophy 97 (5):278-296.
The Advantages of Civic Friendship.Joyce L. Jenkins - 1999 - Journal of Philosophical Research 24:459-471.
Friendship and the Self.Dean Cocking & Jeanette Kennett - 1998 - Ethics 108 (3):502-527.
Rethinking Confucian Friendship.Xiufen Lu - 2010 - Asian Philosophy 20 (3):225-245.
The Circumstances of Justice: Pluralism, Community, and Friendship.Neera Kapur Badhwar - 1993 - Journal of Political Philosophy 1 (3):250–276.
Civic Friendship and Thin Citizenship.R. K. Bentley - 2013 - Res Publica 19 (1):5-19.
Philosophy at the Core of Economic Markets.Karl Reinhard Kolmsee - 2000 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 7 (4):75-78.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-12-22

Total views
14 ( #694,707 of 2,433,567 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #467,718 of 2,433,567 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes