Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 6 (1):55-91 (2003)
Political philosophy has difficulties to cope with the complexity and variety of state-religions relations. Strict separationism is still the preferred option amongst liberals, deliberative and republican democrats, socialist and feminists. In this article, I develop a complex typology based on comparative history and sociology of religions. I summarize my reasons why institutional pluralist models like plural establishment or non-constitutional pluralism are attractive not only for religious minorities but for religiously deeply diverse societies in general. Most attention is paid defending associative democracy, the most flexible and open variety of institutional pluralism, against realist objections that group representation is incompatible with liberal democracy, that it leads to stigmatization and bureaucratization, that it strengthens undemocratic leaders, that it leads to an ossification of the status quo, and, most importantly, that it is inherently divisive undermining social cohesion and political unity. In my refutation of these objections I try to show that it helps to integrate minority religions into liberal democratic policies compatible with reasonable pluralism and to prevent religious and political fundamentalism
|Keywords||associative democracy institutional pluralism non-constitutional pluralism plural establishment Religions and States strict separationism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Beyond Establishment and Separation: Political Liberalism, Religion and Democracy.Matteo Bonotti - 2012 - Res Publica 18 (4):333-349.
Similar books and articles
Philosophers, Theologians, and the Pluralism Problem.Norman Lillegard - 1993 - Philosophy and Theology 7 (4):381-403.
The Possibility of Religious Pluralism: A Reply to Gavin D'Costa.John Hick - 1997 - Religious Studies 33 (2):161-166.
The Quest for Meaning: Developing a Philosophy of Pluralism.Tariq Ramadan - 2010 - Allen Lane.
Defending Religious Pluralism for Religious Education.Andrew Davis - 2010 - Ethics and Education 5 (3):189 - 202.
Toward An Adequate Model for the Theology of Religions.Derek Michaud - 2008 - Engaging Particularities. Chestnut Hill, MA.
Taking Religious Pluralism Seriously. Arguing for an Institutional Turn. Introduction.Veit Bader - 2003 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 6 (1):3-22.
A Cross-Cultural and Buddhist-Friendly Interpretation of the Typology Exclusivism-Inclusivism-Pluralism.Abraham VÃ©Lez de Cea - 2011 - Sophia 50 (3):453-480.
The Impossibility of a Pluralist View of Religions.Gavin D'Costa - 1996 - Religious Studies 32 (2):223 - 232.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads30 ( #172,911 of 2,177,961 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #317,206 of 2,177,961 )
How can I increase my downloads?