Australasian Journal of Philosophy 96 (3):498-507 (2018)
| Authors |
|
| Abstract |
ABSTRACTThis paper addresses the problem of opaque sweetening and argues that one should use stochastic dominance in comparing lotteries even when dealing with incomplete orderings that allow for non-comparable outcomes.
|
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
| Categories |
No categories specified (categorize this paper) |
| Reprint years | 2017, 2018 |
| ISBN(s) | |
| DOI | 10.1080/00048402.2017.1362566 |
| Options |
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Request removal from index
|
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Is Incommensurability Vagueness?John Broome - 1997 - In Ruth Chang (ed.), Incommensurability, Incomparability and Practical Reason. Harvard University Press.
Decision Making in the Face of Parity.Miriam Schoenfield - 2014 - Philosophical Perspectives 28 (1):263-277.
Subjective Expected Utility: A Review of Normative Theories. [REVIEW]Peter C. Fishburn - 1981 - Theory and Decision 13 (2):139-199.
Decision Theory for Agents with Incomplete Preferences.Adam Bales, Daniel Cohen & Toby Handfield - 2014 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 92 (3):453-70.
Citations of this work BETA
Exceeding Expectations: Stochastic Dominance as a General Decision Theory.Christian Tarsney - manuscript
Objective Value Is Always Newcombizable.Arif Ahmed & Jack Spencer - 2019 - Mind 129 (516):1157-1192.
Similar books and articles
Dynamic Stochastic Dominance in Bandit Decision Problems.Thierry Magnac & Jean-Marc Robin - 1999 - Theory and Decision 47 (3):267-295.
Stochastic Dominance in Multicriterion Analysis Under Risk.Jean-Marc Martel & Kazimierz Zaras - 1995 - Theory and Decision 39 (1):31-49.
Decreasing Higher-Order Absolute Risk Aversion and Higher-Degree Stochastic Dominance.Michel Denuit & Liqun Liu - 2014 - Theory and Decision 76 (2):287-295.
Stochastic Revealed Preference and Rationalizability.Jan Heufer - 2011 - Theory and Decision 71 (4):575-592.
On Absolute Preference and Stochastic Dominance.Hector A. Múnera - 1986 - Theory and Decision 21 (1):85-88.
Dominance Criteria for Welfare Comparisons: Using Equivalent Income to Describe Differences in Needs. [REVIEW]Udo Ebert - 2010 - Theory and Decision 69 (1):55-67.
Convex Stochastic Dominance with Finite Consequence Sets.Peter C. Fishburn - 1974 - Theory and Decision 5 (2):119-137.
Monotonicity in Opaque Verbs.Thomas Ede Zimmermann - 2006 - Linguistics and Philosophy 29 (6):715 - 761.
Can Good News Lead to a More Pessimistic Choice of Action?Giacomo Bonanno - 1988 - Theory and Decision 25 (2):123-136.
Utility and Stochastic Dominance.Karl Borch - 1979 - In Maurice Allais & Ole Hagen (eds.), Expected Utility Hypotheses and the Allais Paradox. D. Reidel. pp. 193--201.
Sweetening the Pot with Molasses Cleans TNT-Contaminated Soil.D. J. Pelkie - 1992 - Logos. Anales Del Seminario de Metafísica [Universidad Complutense de Madrid, España] 14 (2):14-15.
Testosterone and the Concept of Dominance.James M. Dabbs - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):370-371.
The Principles of a Stochastic Formulation of Quantum Theory.A. Kyprianidis - 1992 - Foundations of Physics 22 (12):1449-1483.
Sweetening the Scent: Commentary on "What Principlism Misses".D. K. Sokol - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (4):232-233.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2017-08-18
Total views
55 ( #179,565 of 2,403,525 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #126,815 of 2,403,525 )
2017-08-18
Total views
55 ( #179,565 of 2,403,525 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #126,815 of 2,403,525 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads
