A response to Christopher Framarin

Philosophy East and West 61 (4):720-722 (2011)
I thank Christopher Framarin for his response and would like to address three points he raises in this brief rejoinder.Framarin's book is a self-standing analysis of the central argument of the Gītā, and the reader should take my comments about his papers as additional material in support of the book. In drawing attention to them, my aim was to stress Framarin's long engagement with the subject.Although Framarin's book deals quite extensively with other texts from the Indian tradition, the Gītā is central to the analysis. In fact, Framarin explicitly turns to the other texts "[a]s a means to answering the second question," namely whether the claim that action entails desire is widely held in the Indian tradition. ..
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1353/pew.2011.0058
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,820
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Motivation in the Manusm R\D{R}Ti.Christopher G. Framarin - 2006 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 34 (5):397-413.
Taking Desirelessness () Seriously.Christopher G. Framarin - 2005 - Asian Philosophy 15 (2):143 – 155.
Ni K Makarma: How Desireless Need One Be?Christopher Framarin - 2004 - Asian Philosophy 14 (3):239 – 254.
Unselfishness.Christopher G. Framarin - 2008 - International Philosophical Quarterly 48 (1):69-83.
Added to PP index

Total downloads
28 ( #199,781 of 2,210,223 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #223,929 of 2,210,223 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature