Criticism of "brain death" policy in japan

Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 13 (4):359-372 (2003)

: The 1997 Japanese organ transplantation law is the fruit of a long debate on "brain death" and organ transplantation, which involved the general public and experts in the relevant fields. The aim of this paper is to trace the history of the implementation of the law and to critique the law in terms of its consistency and fairness. The paper argues that the legislation adopts a double standard regarding the role of the family. On the one hand, the legislation overemphasizes the family's authority by granting the family a veto on the matter of organ transplantation, while, on the other hand, not allowing the family to make surrogate decisions. In addition, the role of the law in cases involving minor or incompetent patients is shown to be similarly misguided. The paper argues that accepting a decisive role for the family in current law is compatible with Japanese culture
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1353/ken.2004.0002
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 43,980
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

East–West Differences in Perception of Brain Death.Qing Yang & Geoffrey Miller - 2015 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 12 (2):211-225.
Fear, Ambivalence, and Liminality.Michal Rassin, Miri Lowenthal & Dina Silner - 2005 - Jona's Healthcare Law, Ethics, and Regulation 7 (3):79-83.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
507 ( #8,445 of 2,266,543 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
9 ( #116,378 of 2,266,543 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature