Experts' attitudes towards medical futility: an empirical survey from Japan [Book Review]

BMC Medical Ethics 7 (1):1-7 (2006)

BackgroundThe current debate about medical futility is mostly driven by theoretical and personal perspectives and there is a lack of empirical data to document experts and public attitudes towards medical futility.MethodsTo examine the attitudes of the Japanese experts in the fields relevant to medical futility a questionnaire survey was conducted among the members of the Japan Association for Bioethics. A total number of 108 questionnaires returned filled in, giving a response rate of 50.9%. Among the respondents 62% were healthcare professionals (HCPs) and 37% were non-healthcare professionals (Non-HCPs).ResultsThe majority of respondents (67.6 %) believed that a physician's refusal to provide or continue a treatment on the ground of futility judgment could never be morally justified but 22.2% approved such refusal with conditions. In the case of physiologically futile care, three-quarters believed that a physician should inform the patient/family of his futility judgment and it would be the patient who could decide what should be done next, based on his/her value judgment. However more than 10% said that a physician should ask about a patient's value and goals, but the final decision was left to the doctor not the patient. There was no statistically significant difference between HCPs and Non-HCPs (p = 0.676). Of respondents 67.6% believed that practical guidelines set up by the health authority would be helpful in futility judgment.ConclusionThe results show that there is no support for the physicians' unilateral decision- making on futile care. This survey highlights medical futility as an emerging issue in Japanese healthcare and emphasizes on the need for public discussion and policy development.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1186/1472-6939-7-8
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 45,283
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Buddhism and Medical Futility.Tuck Wai Chan & Desley Hegney - 2012 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 9 (4):433-438.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Physician's Authority to Withhold Futile Treatment.Glenn G. Griener - 1995 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 20 (2):207-224.
Towards a Just, Courageous, and Honest Resolution of the Futility Debate.Rosemarie Tong - 1995 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 20 (2):165-189.
A Broader Look at Medical Futility.Wayne Shelton - 1998 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 19 (4):383-400.
Futility and the Varieties of Medical Judgment.Daniel P. Sulmasy - 1997 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 18 (1-2).
Defining Medical Futility and Improving Medical Care.Lawrence Schneiderman - 2011 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 8 (2):123-131.
Autonomy and Futility.William H. Bruening - 1992 - HEC Forum 4 (5):305-313.
Conceptual and Moral Disputes About Futile and Useful Treatments.Loretta M. Kopelman - 1995 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 20 (2):109-121.


Added to PP index

Total views
79 ( #108,589 of 2,279,914 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #306,764 of 2,279,914 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature