Experts, Public Policy and the Question of Trust

In Michael Hannon & Jeroen De Ridder (eds.), Routledge Handbook of Political Epistemology. London, UK: Routledge (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This chapter discusses the topics of trust and expertise from the perspective of political epistemology. In particular, it addresses four main questions: (§1) How should we characterise experts and their expertise? (§2) How can non-experts recognize a reliable expert? (§3) What does it take for non-experts to trust experts? (§4) What problems impede trust in experts?



External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

When Expert Disagreement Supports the Consensus.Finnur Dellsén - 2018 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 96 (1):142-156.
Whom to trust? Public concerns, late modern risks, and expert trustworthiness.Geert Munnichs - 2004 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 17 (2):113-130.
Why Moral Expertise Needs Moral Theory.Michael Cholbi - 2018 - In Jamie Carlin Watson & Laura K. Guidry-Grimes (eds.), Moral Expertise: New Essays from Theoretical and Clinical Bioethics. Springer International Publishing. pp. 71-86.
Experts: What are they and how can laypeople identify them?Thomas Grundmann - forthcoming - In Jennifer Lackey & Aidan McGlynn (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Social Epistemology. Oxford University Press.
What is an expert?Bruce D. Weinstein - 1993 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 14 (1).
Expert Knowledge by Perception.Madeleine Ransom - 2020 - Philosophy 95 (3):309-335.


Added to PP

598 (#22,567)

6 months
129 (#14,461)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Maria Baghramian
University College Dublin
Michel Croce
Università degli Studi di Genova

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references