Intra‐party Democracy: A Functionalist Account

Wiley: Journal of Political Philosophy 30 (3):347-369 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper articulates a functionalist account of intra-party democracy (IPD). Like realist critics, we insist that IPD practices be evaluated on the basis of whether they facilitate resistance to domination and capture at the level of the polity as a whole, and therefore accept certain realist worries about IPD. Yet realists neglect the possibility that wealthy interests could control the political agenda by capturing all viable parties simultaneously-and that mass-facing IPD could counter this threat of oligarchic agenda capture. Taking this as the key function of IPD within broader democratic systems, we conclude that inclusionary party reform is less urgent in more flexible party systems, where dissenters are better able to resist this threat from within the framework of inter-party competition. Regardless of the context, meanwhile, we also conclude that mass-facing IPD practices should aim at enabling ordinary members and supporters of a party to resist agenda capture by oligarchic interests. Though we stop short of defending any particular set of reforms, we reject the emphasis of recent IPD advocates on individualized forms of deliberative participation, in favor of a more oppositional and collectively-oriented approach-on the grounds that the latter is more likely to encourage the development of effective institutions of countervailing power.

Similar books and articles

A Deliberative Model of Intra‐Party Democracy.Fabio Wolkenstein - 2016 - Journal of Political Philosophy 24 (3):297-320.
Membership ballots and the value of intra-party democracy.Fabio Wolkenstein - 2018 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 21 (4):433-455.
Review of Drutman, Breaking the Two-Party Doom Loop. [REVIEW]Walter Horn - 2021 - A Hornbook of Democracy Book Reviews, 3:16 AM.
Features of political interaction of interest groups in the intra-party communication processes.M. Timchenko - 2015 - Epistemological studies in Philosophy, Social and Political Sciences 5:117-125.
Taiwan's Party Primaries in Comparative Perspective.Chung-li Wu & Dafydd Fell - 2001 - Japanese Journal of Political Science 2 (1):23-45.
Joseph Schumpeter's Caesarist Democracy.Josiah Ober - 2017 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 29 (4):473-491.
Functionalism and propositions.John Martin Fischer - 1985 - Philosophical Studies 48 (November):295-311.
Was Hume a Proper Functionalist?Kevin Meeker - 2006 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 72 (1):120-136.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-10-27

Downloads
155 (#82,889)

6 months
57 (#22,430)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Samuel Bagg
University of South Carolina

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references