Skepticism and the Value of Distrust

Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Faced with current urgent calls for more trust in experts, especially in high impact and politically sensitive domains, such as climate science and COVID-19, the complex and problematic nature of public trust in experts and the need for a more critical approach to the topic are easy to overlook. Scepticism – at least in its Humean mitigated form that encourages independent, questioning attitudes – can prove valuable to democratic governance, but stands in opposition to the cognitive dependency entailed by epistemic trust. In this paper, we investigate the tension between the value of mitigated scepticism – understood as the exercise of reason-based doubt in a particular domain – and the need for trust in experts. We offer four arguments in favour of mitigated scepticism: the argument from loss of intellectual autonomy; the argument from democratic deficit; the argument from the normative failures of science; and the argument from past and current injustices. These arguments highlight the tension between the requirements for trust and justified scepticism about the role of experts. One solution, which we reject, is the idea that reliance, rather than trust, is sufficient for the purposes of accommodating experts in policy matters. The solution we endorse is to create a ‘climate of trust’, where questioning experts and expertise is welcomed, but the epistemic trust necessary for action upon information which the public cannot obtain first-hand is enabled and encouraged through structural, institutional, and justice-based measures.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Humble Trust.Jason D’Cruz - 2019 - Philosophical Studies 176 (4):933-953.
Trust, Distrust, and Affective Looping.Karen Jones - 2019 - Philosophical Studies 176 (4):955-968.
Commitment in Cases of Trust and Distrust.Jonathan Tallant - 2017 - Thought: Fordham University Quarterly (4):261-267.
Commitment in Cases of Trust and Distrust.Jonathan Tallant - 2017 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 6 (4):261-267.
On the Democratic Value of Distrust.Erich Hatala Matthes - 2015 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy (3):1-5.
Argumentative Injustice.Patrick Bondy - 2010 - Informal Logic 30 (3):263-278.
Dilemmas of Trust.Trudy Govier - 1998 - Carleton University Press.
Emerging From Distrust: A Review of Strategies and Principles for Action. [REVIEW]Patti Tamara Lenard - 2008 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 11 (3):357-368.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-11-25

Downloads
95 (#127,722)

6 months
21 (#48,090)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Silvia Caprioglio Panizza
University College Dublin
Maria Baghramian
University College Dublin

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references