A man and a dog in a lifeboat: Self-sacrifice, animals, and the limits of ethical theory

Ethics and the Environment 14 (1):pp. 129-148 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In discussions of animal ethics, hypothetical scenarios are often used to try to force the clarification of intuitions about the relative value of human and animal life. Tom Regan requests, for example, that we imagine a man and a dog adrift in a lifeboat while Peter Singer explains why the life of one's child ought to be preferred to that of the family dog in the event of a house fire. I argue that such scenarios are not the usefully abstract analytic tools they purport to be, but indirectly reinforce assumptions that are not only anthropocentric, but also tied to racist, sexist and ethnocentric stereotypes. An analysis of some of the cultural and ethical associations of the notion of self-sacrifice proves especially useful in revealing some of the limitations of certain popular Western approaches to animal ethics.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,227

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Attitudes to animals: views in animal welfare.Francine L. Dolins (ed.) - 1999 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Regan on the lifeboat problem: A defense.Julian H. Franklin - 2001 - Environmental Ethics 23 (2):189-201.
New Dog: Old Tricks.Mark Greene - 2002 - Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 5 (3):239-242.
I ♥ my dog.Kennan Ferguson - 2004 - Political Theory 32 (3):373-395.
Sinking the research lifeboat.Susan Finsen - 1988 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 13 (2):197-212.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-05-13

Downloads
149 (#127,325)

6 months
7 (#439,760)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references