Ethics and the Environment 14 (1):pp. 129-148 (2009)
In discussions of animal ethics, hypothetical scenarios are often used to try to force the clarification of intuitions about the relative value of human and animal life. Tom Regan requests, for example, that we imagine a man and a dog adrift in a lifeboat while Peter Singer explains why the life of one's child ought to be preferred to that of the family dog in the event of a house fire. I argue that such scenarios are not the usefully abstract analytic tools they purport to be, but indirectly reinforce assumptions that are not only anthropocentric, but also tied to racist, sexist and ethnocentric stereotypes. An analysis of some of the cultural and ethical associations of the notion of self-sacrifice proves especially useful in revealing some of the limitations of certain popular Western approaches to animal ethics.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Attitudes to Animals: Views in Animal Welfare.Francine L. Dolins (ed.) - 1999 - Cambridge University Press.
Animals, Rights, and Reason in Plutarch and Modern Ethics.Stephen Thomas Newmyer - 2006 - Routledge.
Ground Zero for a Post-Moral Ethics in J. M. Coetzee's Disgrace and Julia Kristeva's Melancholic.Cynthia Willett - 2012 - Continental Philosophy Review 45 (1):1-22.
Ethical Responsibilities Towards Dogs: An Inquiry Into the Dog–Human Relationship. [REVIEW]Kristien Hens - 2009 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 22 (1):3-14.
Regan on the Lifeboat Problem: A Defense.Julian H. Franklin - 2001 - Environmental Ethics 23 (2):189-201.
Added to index2009-05-13
Total downloads106 ( #45,549 of 2,153,830 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #162,587 of 2,153,830 )
How can I increase my downloads?