Confucianism-Based Rights Skepticism and Rights in the Workplace

Business Ethics Quarterly 21 (4):661-672 (2011)
Abstract
Must even Confucian rights skeptics—those who are, on account of their Confucian beliefs, skeptical of the existence of human rights, and believe that asserting or recognizing rights is morally wrong—concede that in the workplace, they are morally obligated to recognize rights? Alan Strudler has recently argued that such is the case. In this article, I argue that because Confucian rights skeptics locate wrongness in inconsistency with the idea of “Confucian community,” Confucian community should be viewed as a moral ideal. I then argue that Confucian rights skeptics ought to act in a manner that is consistent with this ideal, even when the ideal has not yet been realized, just as Kantians ought to act consistently with the Kantian kingdom of ends ideal. Accordingly, contrary to Strudler, I argue that Confucian rights skeptics need not concede that they are morally obligated to recognize rights in the workplace. This conclusion suggests the need for inquiry into the metaphysical foundations of these conflicting views. However, such inquiry is commonly thought to lie beyond the scope of philosophical business ethics proper. I conclude the article by suggesting a number of reasons for business ethicists to consider rejecting the prevalent narrow conception of the scope of the discipline.
Keywords business ethics  moral philosophy  applied ethics
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 28,777
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Confucian Skepticism About Workplace Rights.Alan Strudler - 2008 - Business Ethics Quarterly 18 (1):67-83.
Confucianism and Human Rights.Justin Tiwald - 2011 - In Thomas Cushman (ed.), Routledge Handbook of Human Rights. Routledge. pp. 244.
Rights in the Workplace: A Nozickian Argument. [REVIEW]Ian Maitland - 1989 - Journal of Business Ethics 8 (12):951 - 954.
Collective Rights and Minority Rights.Seumas Miller - 2000 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 14 (2):241-257.
The Rights of Irregular Migrants.Joseph H. Carens - 2008 - Ethics and International Affairs 22 (2):163–186.
Rival Confucian Rights.May Sim - 2011 - International Philosophical Quarterly 51 (1):5-22.
Human Rights and Human Well-Being.W. J. Talbott - 2010 - Oxford University Press.
Liberal Rights or/and Confucian Virtues?Seung-hwan Lee - 1996 - Philosophy East and West 46 (3):367-379.
The Moral Foundation of Rights.L. W. Sumner - 1987 - Oxford University Press.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-08-23

Total downloads

3 ( #704,312 of 2,177,961 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #317,206 of 2,177,961 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums