Spontaneous Generations 4 (1):94-110 (2010)
We live in a world that increasingly is designed by engineers. So it is worth asking what are engineers doing when they design. There is no simple universal answer to this question, and my strategy for answering it both acknowledges the impossibility of a simple answer, while also identifying and elaborating some important elements to engineering realities. I start with the simple posit that engineering a reality is about controlling aspects of that reality through designed artifice. I then “complexify” this simple idea by examining one company’s multiple contributions to engineering realities. Ometric Corporation was birthed out of the USC NanoCenter in the fall of 2004. The company makes spectrometric equipment that allows for “real time in line” analysis—and control—of materials. Markets that Ometric is focusing on include pharmaceuticals, food and energy. But Ometric lives in an engineer’s reality, while simultaneously working to engineer realities. It must survive financially, initially by selling the ideas behind its innovations to venture capitalists, and then by selling products to markets that may or may not currently exist. Ometric is the product of the University of South Carolina’s efforts to turn its intellectual property into gold for the University. Ometric, thus, is part of a larger effort to re-engineer the University and its relationship to industry. My examination of Ometric, then, identifies some key ways that “control through designed artifice” is a complex, and yet prevalent and powerful force in the construction of our realities
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
“Mind the Gaps”: An Empirical Approach to Engineering Ethics, 1997–2001. [REVIEW]Robert E. McGinn - 2003 - Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (4):517-542.
Thinking Like an Engineer: Studies in the Ethics of a Profession.Michael Davis - 1998 - Oxford University Press.
An Historical Preface to Engineering Ethics.Michael Davis - 1995 - Science and Engineering Ethics 1 (1):33-48.
The Place of Engineering and the Engineering of Place.Gene Moriarty - 2000 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 5 (2):83-96.
Incorporating Environmental Ethics Into the Undergraduate Engineering Curriculum.Katherine Rowden & Bradley Striebig - 2004 - Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (2):417-422.
The Professional Approach to Engineering Ethics: Five Research Questions.Michael Davis - 2001 - Science and Engineering Ethics 7 (3):379-390.
What's Philosophically Interesting About Engineering Ethics?Michael Davis - 2003 - Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (3):353-361.
The Importance of Philosophy to Engineering.Carl Mitcham - 1998 - Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy 17 (3):27-47.
Engineering Good: How Engineering Metaphors Help Us to Understand the Moral Life and Change Society.Mark Coeckelbergh - 2010 - Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (2):371-385.
Engineering Design and Adaptation.Robert C. Richardson - 2003 - Philosophy of Science 70 (5):1277-1288.
Added to index2010-09-13
Total downloads6 ( #550,590 of 2,153,475 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #399,083 of 2,153,475 )
How can I increase my downloads?