Futility, Autonomy, and Cost in End-of-Life Care

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (2):172-182 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper uses the controversy over the denial of care on futility grounds as a window into the broader issue of the role of cost in decisions about treatment near the end of life. The focus is on a topic that has not received the attention it deserves: the difference between refusing medical treatment and demanding it. The author discusses health care reform and the ethics of cost control, arguing that we cannot achieve universal access to quality care at affordable care without better public understanding of the moral legitimacy of taking cost into account in health care decisions, even decisions at the end of life

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,197

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Who should manage care? The case for providers.John D. Stobo - 1997 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 7 (4):387-389.
The doctor, the rich, and the indigent.Gordon Graham - 1987 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 12 (1):51-61.
Care, Compassion, or Cost: Redefining the Basis of Treatment in Ethics and Law.Tom Koch - 2011 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (2):130-139.
Towards a just, courageous, and honest resolution of the futility debate.Rosemarie Tong - 1995 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 20 (2):165-189.
Costs and End-of-Life Care in the NICU: Lessons for the MICU?John D. Lantos & William L. Meadow - 2011 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (2):194-200.
Contemporary Catholic health care ethics.David F. Kelly - 2004 - Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-12

Downloads
94 (#183,867)

6 months
19 (#137,612)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?