Fermat’s Dilemma: Why Did He Keep Mum on Infinitesimals? And the European Theological Context

Foundations of Science 23 (3):559-595 (2018)

Authors
David Sherry
Northern Arizona University
Abstract
The first half of the 17th century was a time of intellectual ferment when wars of natural philosophy were echoes of religious wars, as we illustrate by a case study of an apparently innocuous mathematical technique called adequality pioneered by the honorable judge Pierre de Fermat, its relation to indivisibles, as well as to other hocus-pocus. André Weil noted that simple applications of adequality involving polynomials can be treated purely algebraically but more general problems like the cycloid curve cannot be so treated and involve additional tools–leading the mathematician Fermat potentially into troubled waters. Breger attacks Tannery for tampering with Fermat’s manuscript but it is Breger who tampers with Fermat’s procedure by moving all terms to the left-hand side so as to accord better with Breger’s own interpretation emphasizing the double root idea. We provide modern proxies for Fermat’s procedures in terms of relations of infinite proximity as well as the standard part function.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s10699-017-9542-y
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 48,824
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Non-Standard Analysis.Gert Heinz Müller - 1969 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 34 (2):292-294.
Leibniz Versus Ishiguro: Closing a Quarter Century of Syncategoremania.Tiziana Bascelli, Piotr Błaszczyk, Vladimir Kanovei, Karin U. Katz, Mikhail G. Katz, David M. Schaps & David Sherry - 2016 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 6 (1):117-147.

View all 22 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Finite Arithmetic with Infinite Descent.Yvon Gauthier - 1989 - Dialectica 43 (4):329-337.
Huygens Versus Fermat: No Clear Winner.Paul J. H. Schoemaker - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (6):781-782.
Huygens' Principle: A Case Against Optimality.Hans-Martin Gaertner - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (6):779-781.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-11-15

Total views
8 ( #890,960 of 2,309,335 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #761,345 of 2,309,335 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature