Philo 13 (1):5-17 (2010)
AbstractJohn Hick’s theory of religious pluralism posits the same ineffable spiritual reality, ‘the Real,’ as the source of all major religious traditions. He offers pluralism as the best explanation of salvific parity, the thesis that these religions are equally effective vehicles for salvation. Most criticisms of Hick have focused on the explanans, arguing that the Real cannot play any explanatory role due to its ineffability. I raise two difficulties for the explanandum, the thesis of salvific parity. I call these the problems of bad religion and good secularism
Similar books and articles
Religious Ambiguity in Hick’s Religious Pluralism.Amir Dastmalchian - 2009 - International Journal of Hekmat 1:75-89.
Internal realism and the problem of religious diversity.Victoria S. Harrison - 2006 - Philosophia 34 (3):287-301.
Reconstructing John Hick’s theory of religious pluralism: a Chinese folk religion’s perspective.Wai Yip Wong - unknown
John Hick’s Pluralism: A Reconsideration of Its Philosophical Framework.Bernd Irlenborn - 2011 - Philosophy and Theology 23 (2):267-280.
Defending religious pluralism for religious education.Andrew Davis - 2010 - Ethics and Education 5 (3):189 - 202.
The Philosophical Challenge of Religious Diversity.Philip L. Quinn & Kevin Meeker (eds.) - 1999 - New York: Oxford University Press.
The Politics of Religious Pluralism.Merold Westphal - 1999 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 1999:1-8.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
The Incompatibility Problem and Religious Pluralism Beyond Hick.Samuel Ruhmkorff - 2013 - Philosophy Compass 8 (5):510-522.
References found in this work
No references found.