On the backs of animals: The valorization of reason in contemporary animal ethics

Ethics and the Environment 10 (1):1-17 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

: Despite the fact that feminists have compellingly drawn connections between traditional notions of reason and the oppression of women and nature, many animal ethicists fail to deeply incorporate these insights. After detailing the links between reason and the oppression of women and animals, I argue that the work of philosophers such as Tom Regan and Peter Singer fails to reflect that what feminists have called is not the mere inclusion of emotion, but a recognition of the inherent continuity between the two. To ignore this continuity, I conclude, risks reinscribing the very suffering we seek to eliminate

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,369

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Good for and good about.Jenny Teichman - 2003 - Philosophy 78 (1):115-121.
Animal rights: moral theory and practice.Mark Rowlands - 2009 - New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Without a tear: our tragic relationship with animals.Mark H. Bernstein - 2004 - Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Science, knowledge, and animal minds.Dale Jamieson - 1998 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 98 (1):79–102.
Animal Ethics: Toward an Ethics of Responsiveness.Kelly Oliver - 2010 - Research in Phenomenology 40 (2):267-280.
The Feminist Connection between Women and Animals.Beth A. Dixon - 1996 - Environmental Ethics 18 (2):181-194.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
95 (#182,809)

6 months
8 (#372,083)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?