Ethics and Information Technology 9 (2):129-139 (2007)
Will the proliferation of devices that provide the continuous archival and retrieval of personal experiences (CARPE) improve control over, access to and the record of collective knowledge as Vannevar Bush once predicted with his futuristic memex? Or is it possible that their increasing ubiquity might pose fundamental risks to humanity, as Donald Norman contemplated in his investigation of an imaginary CARPE device he called the “Teddy”? Through an examination of the webcam experiment of Jenni Ringley and the EyeTap experiments of Steve Mann, this article explores some of the social implications of CARPE. The authors’ central claim is that focussing on notions of individual consent and control in assessing the privacy implications of CARPE while reflective of the individualistic conception of privacy that predominates western thinking, is nevertheless inadequate in terms of recognizing the effect of individual uptake of these kinds of technologies on the level of privacy we are all collectively entitled to expect. The authors urge that future analysis ought to take a broader approach that considers contextual factors affecting user groups and the possible limitations on our collective ability to control the social meanings associated with the subsequent distribution and use of personal images and experiences after they are captured and archived. The authors ultimately recommend an approach that takes into account the collective impact that CARPE technologies will have on privacy and identity formation and highlight aspects of that approach.
|Keywords||privacy surveillance personal experience capture carpe equality webcamming eyetap glogging Vannevar Bush Jennicam sousveillance equiveillance informed consent reasonable expectation of privacy|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
The Generalized Sousveillance Society.J. -G. Ganascia - 2010 - Social Science Information 49 (3):489-507.
Challenges and Opportunities of Lifelog Technologies: A Literature Review and Critical Analysis.Tim Jacquemard, Peter Novitzky, Fiachra O’Brolcháin, Alan F. Smeaton & Bert Gordijn - 2014 - Science and Engineering Ethics 20 (2):379-409.
Similar books and articles
Layering Privacy on Operating Systems, Social Networks, and Other Platforms by Design.Dawn Jutla - 2010 - Identity in the Information Society 3 (2):319-341.
Health Information: Reconciling Personal Privacy with the Public Good of Human Health. [REVIEW]Lawrence O. Gostin - 2001 - Health Care Analysis 9 (3):321-335.
Unknowableness and Informational Privacy.David Matheson - 2007 - Journal of Philosophical Research 32:251-267.
Unself-Conscious Control: Broadening the Notion of Control Through Experiences of Flow and Wu-Wei.Valérie de Prycker - 2011 - Zygon 46 (1):5-25.
Facebook and the Commercialisation of Personal Information: Some Questions of Provider-to-User Privacy.Jennifer Hendry & Kay Goodall - unknown
Technology Paternalism – Wider Implications of Ubiquitous Computing.Sarah Spiekermann & Frank Pallas - 2006 - Poiesis and Praxis 4 (1):6-18.
Privacy and Discrete "Social Spheres".Jonathan Schonscheck - 1997 - Ethics and Behavior 7 (3):221 – 228.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads39 ( #132,345 of 2,169,071 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #345,851 of 2,169,071 )
How can I increase my downloads?