You Are An Animal

Res Philosophica 93 (1):205-218 (2016)

Authors
Andrew M. Bailey
Yale-NUS College
Abstract
According to the doctrine of animalism, we are animals in the primary and non-derivative sense. In this article, I introduce and defend a novel argument for the view.
Keywords Catholic Tradition  Contemporary Philosophy  History of Philosophy
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2016
ISBN(s) 2168-9105
DOI 10.11612/resphil.2016.93.1.9
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 47,122
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The View From Nowhere.Thomas Nagel - 1986 - Oxford University Press.
Intentionality.John Searle - 1983 - Oxford University Press.
Many, but Almost One.David K. Lewis - 1993 - In Keith Cambell, John Bacon & Lloyd Reinhardt (eds.), Ontology, Causality and Mind: Essays on the Philosophy of D. M. Armstrong. Cambridge University Press. pp. 23-38.

View all 50 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Material Through and Through.Andrew M. Bailey - forthcoming - Philosophical Studies:1-20.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Animal Welfare.C. R. W. Spedding - 2000 - Earthscan Publications.
Popular Media and Animals.Claire Molloy - 2011 - Palgrave-Macmillan.
Animal Rights.Shasta Gaughen (ed.) - 2005 - Greenhaven Press.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-10-03

Total views
1,272 ( #2,046 of 2,289,285 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
196 ( #2,292 of 2,289,285 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature