Medical ethics' appropriation of moral philosophy: The case of the sympathetic and the unsympathetic physician

Abstract
Philosophy textbooks typically treat bioethics as a form of "applied ethics"-i.e., an attempt to apply a moral theory, like utilitarianism, to controversial ethical issues in biology and medicine. Historians, however, can find virtually no cases in which applied philosophical moral theory influenced ethical practice in biology or medicine. In light of the absence of historical evidence, the authors of this paper advance an alternative model of the historical relationship between philosophical ethics and medical ethics, the appropriation model. They offer two historical case studies to illustrate the ways in which physicians have "appropriated" concepts and theory fragments from philosophers, and demonstrate how appropriated moral philosophy profoundly influenced the way medical morality was conceived and practiced
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1353/ken.2007.0000
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,300
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
The Hippocratic Thorn in Bioethics' Hide: Cults, Sects, and Strangeness.T. Koch - 2014 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 39 (1):75-88.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
35 ( #151,127 of 2,193,221 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #290,278 of 2,193,221 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature