Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (1):22-23 (2009)
| Abstract |
In middle childhood, boys show more avoidant attachments and girls more ambivalent attachments as a prelude to gender differentiation in reproductive strategies. However, we have failed to find systematic and method-independent gender differences in middle or late childhood attachments, nor in adult attachment representations. We conclude that Del Giudice's model rests on a brittle empirical basis
|
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
| Categories | (categorize this paper) |
| DOI | 10.1017/S0140525X09000843 |
| Options |
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Request removal from index
|
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No Reliable Gender Differences in Attachment Across the Lifespan.Marian J. Bakermans-Kranenburg & Marinus H. van IJzendoorn - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (1):22-23.
Citations of this work BETA
No Reliable Gender Differences in Attachment Across the Lifespan.Marian J. Bakermans-Kranenburg & Marinus H. van IJzendoorn - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (1):22-23.
Implicit Attitude Toward Caregiving: The Moderating Role of Adult Attachment Styles.Pietro De Carli, Angela Tagini, Diego Sarracino, Alessandra Santona & Laura Parolin - 2015 - Frontiers in Psychology 6.
Is It Attachment Style or Socio-Demography: Singlehood in a Representative Sample.Katja Petrowski, Susan Schurig, Gabriele Schmutzer, Elmar Brähler & Yve Stöbel-Richter - 2015 - Frontiers in Psychology 6.
Significant Differences in Personality Styles of Securely and Insecurely Attached Psychotherapists: Data, Reflections and Implications.Burkhard Peter & Eva Böbel - 2020 - Frontiers in Psychology 11.
Similar books and articles
Gender Differences in Ethical Perceptions of Salespeople: An Empirical Examination in Turkey. [REVIEW]Azize Ergeneli & Semra Arıkan - 2002 - Journal of Business Ethics 40 (3):247 - 260.
Pre-Adjustment of Adult Attachment Style to Extrinsic Risk Levels Via Early Attachment Style is Neither Specific, nor Reliable, nor Effective, and is Thus Not an Adaptation.Johannes Hönekopp - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (1):31-31.
Gender Differences in Ethics Research: The Importance of Controlling for the Social Desirability Response Bias. [REVIEW]Derek Dalton & Marc Ortegren - 2011 - Journal of Business Ethics 103 (1):73-93.
No Man’s Land: Exploring the Space Between Gilligan and Kohlberg. [REVIEW]Gabriel D. Donleavy - 2008 - Journal of Business Ethics 80 (4):807 - 822.
New Research, Old Problems: Methodological and Ethical Issues in fMRI Research Examining Sex/Gender Differences in Emotion Processing.Robyn Bluhm - 2013 - Neuroethics 6 (2):319-330.
Gender and Ethical Orientation: A Test of Gender and Occupational Socialization Theories. [REVIEW]E. Sharon Mason & Peter E. Mudrack - 1996 - Journal of Business Ethics 15 (6):599 - 604.
Gender Differences in Moral Sensitivity: A Meta-Analysis.Yukiko di YouMaeda & Muriel J. Bebeau - 2011 - Ethics and Behavior 21 (4):263 - 282.
Gender-Related Differences in Ethical and Social Values of Business Students: Implications for Management. [REVIEW]Patricia Smith & Ellwood Oakley - 1997 - Journal of Business Ethics 16 (1):37-45.
In Defence of Situational Morality: Genetic, Dispositional and Situational Determinants of Children’s Donating to Charity.Marinus H. van IJzendoorn, Marian J. Bakermans-Kranenburg, Fieke Pannebakker & Dorothée Out - 2010 - Journal of Moral Education 39 (1):1-20.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2009-02-13
Total views
172 ( #55,418 of 2,409,938 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #348,054 of 2,409,938 )
2009-02-13
Total views
172 ( #55,418 of 2,409,938 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #348,054 of 2,409,938 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads
