Teaching Philosophy 44 (2):145-157 (2021)
AbstractThis piece offers a critique of what is commonly the structure of introductory philosophy textbooks, syllabi, and courses. The basic criticism is that this structure perpetuates the systematic devaluing of the views of historically marginalized and exploited people. The form my critique takes is that of a referee report on a hypothetical manuscript for an introductory philosophy textbook, authored by “Dr. Unspecified.” I examine what the manuscript chooses to focus on and what it chooses to omit from discussion. I thereby outline much of the content typically used to introduce newcomers to philosophy, while illustrating that presenting exclusively that content supports a prejudiced view of philosophy. I try to show how this representation of philosophy marginalizes the concerns and insights of many and reinforces the disproportionate extent to which those who can do philosophy for a living are white, straight, men with typical body morphology. My report also identifies various ways that the content of an introductory philosophy textbook or course could be modified or supplemented in light of the sort of critique my report makes.
Similar books and articles
Are Methodological Rules Hypothetical Imperatives?David B. Resnik - 1992 - Philosophy of Science 59 (3):498-507.
Reply to Professor Anderson.Gerard Casey - 1995 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 69 (4):621-622.
Referee Report on an Earlier Draft of Peters and Ceci's Target Article.William A. Scott - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):238-238.
Rules, Standards, and the Video Assistant Referee in Football.Jan Zglinski - 2020 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 16 (1):3-19.
Medicolegal Aspect of Death: Medical Referee’s Input in the Aftermath of Shipman.M. I. Memon, M. A. Memon, J. S. Horner & M. H. McCann - 2001 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 7 (1):81-83.
Referee’s Report on Leonid Levin’s Dissertation “Some Theorems on the Algorithmic Approach to Probability Theory and Information Theory”. [REVIEW]N. A. Shanin - 2010 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 162 (3):236.
The Stoics on Hypotheses and Hypothetical Arguments.Susanne Bobzien - 1997 - Phronesis 42 (3):299-312.
Cosmetic Neurology: Sliding Down the Slippery Slope?Veikko Launis - 2010 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 19 (2):218.
The Right of Reply to Professor Sheehan in Advance.Gaëtan Pégny - forthcoming - Philosophy Today.
Illness as Transformative Experience:Implications of Philosophy for Advance Care Planning.Barnaby Hole & Lucy Selman - forthcoming - Journal of Pain and Symptom Management.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads