The indispensability argument and multiple foundations for mathematics

Philosophical Quarterly 53 (210):49–67 (2003)
Abstract
One recent trend in the philosophy of mathematics has been to approach the central epistemological and metaphysical issues concerning mathematics from the perspective of the applications of mathematics to describing the world, especially within the context of empirical science. A second area of activity is where philosophy of mathematics intersects with foundational issues in mathematics, including debates over the choice of set-theoretic axioms, and over whether category theory, for example, may provide an alternative foundation for mathematics. My central claim is that these latter issues are of direct relevance to philosophical arguments connected to the applicability of mathematics. In particular, the possibility of there being distinct alternative foundations for mathematics blocks the standard argument from the indispensable role of mathematics in science to the existence of specific mathematical objects.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/1467-9213.00295
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,530
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
What Numbers Could Not Be.Paul Benacerraf - 1965 - Philosophical Review 74 (1):47-73.
Indispensability and Practice.Penelope Maddy - 1992 - Journal of Philosophy 89 (6):275-289.
Empiricism, Scientific Change and Mathematical Change.O. Bueno - 2000 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 31 (2):269-296.
The Uses and Abuses of the History of Topos Theory.Colin McLarty - 1990 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 41 (3):351-375.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Intrinsic Explanation and Field's Dispensabilist Strategy.Russell Marcus - 2013 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 21 (2):163-183.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
What's Wrong with Indispensability?Mary Leng - 2002 - Synthese 131 (3):395 - 417.
What is Applied Mathematics?James Robert Brown - 1997 - Foundations of Science 2 (1):21-37.
Reflections on Mathematics.Edward N. Zalta - 2007 - In V. F. Hendricks & Hannes Leitgeb (eds.), Philosophy of Mathematics: Five Questions. Automatic Press/VIP.
Towards a Philosophy of Applied Mathematics.Christopher Pincock - 2009 - In Otávio Bueno & Øystein Linnebo (eds.), New Waves in Philosophy of Mathematics. Palgrave-Macmillan.
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
97 ( #56,053 of 2,210,873 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #154,249 of 2,210,873 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature